On 26/04/2012 06:09, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 04/26/2012 03:55 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
What do people think of the idea of adding specific distros (e.g.
"Linux (Fedora/RHEL)", "Linux (Ubuntu)") to the "Platforms" table for
cases related to building and packaging where it may not be clear if
the
On 04/26/2012 03:55 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> What do people think of the idea of adding specific distros (e.g.
> "Linux (Fedora/RHEL)", "Linux (Ubuntu)") to the "Platforms" table for
> cases related to building and packaging where it may not be clear if
> the problem lies within CPython or within
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:55 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> While helping to diagnose what appears to be a Fedora/RHEL specific
> problem with distutils, it occurred to me that it may be useful for
> triaging that kind of distribution specific problem if distro package
> maintainers (or at least point
While helping to diagnose what appears to be a Fedora/RHEL specific
problem with distutils, it occurred to me that it may be useful for
triaging that kind of distribution specific problem if distro package
maintainers (or at least points of contact) were listed in the experts
file in the devguide:
Hi Jesse:
Yes, I can confirm this. And, a good indication of it/documented on or
can be found on the bug tracker. If the item: Contributor Form Received
is marked (Yes) then chances are very high that I have already taken care
of the contributor form.
I look over more and more contributor forms
>
> Guido mentioned him at the 2011 Language Summit as a vanished
> contributor that we'd really like to get an agreement from.
>
> +1
>
> --
> KBK
Interesting note: We supposedly have a contributor agreement on file for him
now:
Contributor Form Received Yes on: 2012-02-26.05:00:00
I'll f
> >
> >
> > Uh, Wow. Yes. He should have commit rights - he was granted them when
> > the multiprocessing pep was approved, but then vanished for several
> > years (myself and others tried getting a hold of him).
>
>
>
> Actually, I don't see his name in the SSH keys history, so apparently he
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012, at 03:08 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be
> > seen from (part of) its contributions below:
> >
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > H
Le mercredi 25 avril 2012 à 15:08 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit :
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be
> > seen from (part of) its contributions below:
> >
> >
> [snip]
>
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be
> seen from (part of) its contributions below:
>
>
[snip]
>
> He writes good code, has good ideas, is reactive to comments and
> reviews,
Hi,
Richard (sbt) has been contributing for quite some time now, as can be
seen from (part of) its contributions below:
"""
- Issue #4892: multiprocessing Connections can now be transferred over
multiprocessing Connections. Patch by Richard Oudkerk (sbt).
- Issue #11750: The Windows API funct
11 matches
Mail list logo
