On 23 June 2013 12:56, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/6/22 Eli Bendersky :
>> Yes, this makes sense too.
>>
>> In general there seems to be an agreement, so it would be great to document
>> in some place. Many years will pass before we have another "special" release
>> like Python 2.7, so it's wo
2013/6/22 Eli Bendersky :
> Yes, this makes sense too.
>
> In general there seems to be an agreement, so it would be great to document
> in some place. Many years will pass before we have another "special" release
> like Python 2.7, so it's worth spending an extra few minutes to have this
> written
Maybe time it so when we *would* have released a 2.8 (18 months or so after
2.7) is when it goes into critical/security fixes only?
On Jun 22, 2013 11:50 PM, "Eli Bendersky" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrot
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> [1] Well, maybe penultimate, but I wouldn't mind seeing the Mercurial
> equivalent of a wrastlin' match between him and the BDFL. :)
You wouldn't see that this summer though -- I could just tackle him in
the office. :-)
--
--Guido van Ross
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
> >I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
> >to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
> >it's only bug fixes, document
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:35:41 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
> >I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
> >to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
> >it's only bug fixes, docume
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
>to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
>it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests. But it seems that
>there are developers w
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 12:02 -0700, Eli Bendersky a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're
> supposed to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the
> impression that it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests.
> But it seem
Hello,
I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests. But it seems that
there are developers who see it otherwise.
For example, Raymond's cha
