Am 01.12.2013 03:12, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> On 1 December 2013 01:49, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> OK, moving on to mechanics, here's what I would like to propose:
>>>
>>> - flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
>>> python
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 12:12:08 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I don't appear to have the necessary tracker access to actually move
> his account to read-only status, though (this change should be made on
> the meta-tracker as well).
You should have the necessary privileges on the tracker now, since I
Nick,
Thanks for doing this emotionally grueling task.
--Guido
On Saturday, November 30, 2013, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 1 December 2013 01:49, Eli Bendersky >
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan
> > >
> wrote:
> >> OK, moving on to mechanics, here's what I would like to
On 1 December 2013 01:49, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> OK, moving on to mechanics, here's what I would like to propose:
>>
>> - flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
>> python-dev, python-ideas and distutils-sig (are there an
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2013, at 05:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >- flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
> >python-dev, python-ideas and distutils-sig (are there any other lists
> >where his presence is considered disruptive?).
>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On sam., 2013-11-30 at 11:10 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 2013, at 05:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >
> > >- flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
> > >python-dev, python-ideas and distutils-sig (are there a
On sam., 2013-11-30 at 11:10 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2013, at 05:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >- flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
> >python-dev, python-ideas and distutils-sig (are there any other lists
> >where his presence is considered disruptive?).
>
On 1 Dec 2013 01:49, "Eli Bendersky" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> On 30 November 2013 15:23, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> > Nick,
>> >
>> > I think we've seen the issue from every possible side now. I trust your
>> > judgment that he has pulled this
On Nov 30, 2013, at 05:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>- flip his moderation bit on the mailing lists, at least for
>python-dev, python-ideas and distutils-sig (are there any other lists
>where his presence is considered disruptive?).
Done, for techto...@gmail.com on all three lists.
-Barry
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 November 2013 15:23, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Nick,
> >
> > I think we've seen the issue from every possible side now. I trust your
> > judgment that he has pulled this trick once too many times. So please
> > implement the ban. Or
These steps sound right to me. Make the notification a private email, not a
public one -- this doesn't have to be a big deal. It's not a warning shot
to other people, this is one isolated individual, and we should treat it as
such.
Alex
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On
On sam., 2013-11-30 at 08:58 +0200, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> I personally don't have problems talking with him, and, if we decided
> not to ban him, I'm available to spend more time talking with him and
> being a mediator.
And the end result is that the community spends time "mediating" with a
jerk i
12 matches
Mail list logo
