Am 16.01.2014 12:17, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
This is such an obvious question that it probably has been raised before, but
anyway:
Why not branch 3.4 earlier than release? That is how big projects are
managed nowadays, you create a staging branch early.
I'd suggest branching it off
I suppose different projects have different ways, but I'm actually talking
about commercial projects with which I am somewhat familiar.
Once a project goes into feature freeze, it is branched off so that continued
feature development can commence, while
Defects are ironed out in the branch.
On 16 Jan 2014 21:54, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com
wrote:
I suppose different projects have different ways, but I'm actually
talking about commercial projects with which I am somewhat familiar.
Once a project goes into feature freeze, it is branched off so that
continued feature
Am 16.01.14 12:38, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
I suppose different projects have different ways, but I'm actually talking
about commercial projects with which I am somewhat familiar.
Once a project goes into feature freeze, it is branched off so that continued
feature development can
Am 16.01.2014 12:17, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
This is such an obvious question that it probably has been raised before
Oh, only once or twice for every 3.x release so far :)
but anyway:
Why not branch 3.4 earlier than release? That is how big projects are managed
nowadays, you
On jeu., 2014-01-16 at 14:22 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 12:17, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
This is such an obvious question that it probably has been raised before
Oh, only once or twice for every 3.x release so far :)
but anyway:
Why not branch 3.4 earlier than
Am 16.01.2014 14:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
On jeu., 2014-01-16 at 14:22 +0100, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 12:17, schrieb Kristján Valur Jónsson:
This is such an obvious question that it probably has been raised before
Oh, only once or twice for every 3.x release so far :)
but
Hi all,
I'm planning to release 3.3.4 candidate 1 together with 3.4 beta 3, i.e. on
the 26th -- and then 3.3.4 final two weeks later if nothing bad comes up.
As always, there will be one more full 3.3 release after 3.4 final, probably
in the May-June timeframe.
cheers,
Georg
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, at 06:30 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to release 3.3.4 candidate 1 together with 3.4 beta 3, i.e.
on
the 26th -- and then 3.3.4 final two weeks later if nothing bad comes up.
As always, there will be one more full 3.3 release after 3.4 final,
The hope is that by not adding features to 2.x, people will flock around 3.x en
masse :)
K
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de]
Sent: 16. janúar 2014 20:19
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson; Matthias Klose; python-committers@python.org
Subject: Re:
четвер, 16-січ-2014 15:03:28 Georg Brandl написано:
Am 16.01.2014 14:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
The question is less for us than for occasional contributors who see
their patches or feature requests languish on the tracker, and lose
interest.
To be honest, most patches and feature
On 17 Jan 2014 01:02, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com
wrote:
The hope is that by not adding features to 2.x, people will flock around
3.x en masse :)
Very few of us think that way - it's that we think Python 3 is a better
language in most ways, and it is certainly much easier and
On 17 Jan 2014 03:25, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com wrote:
четвер, 16-січ-2014 15:03:28 Georg Brandl написано:
Am 16.01.2014 14:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
The question is less for us than for occasional contributors who see
their patches or feature requests languish on the
I never got the impression that this was a matter of funding, Nick.
And while I completely understand that core developers enjoy working in 3 much
more, it was decided to not accept any improvements for a +2.7 version even
from those that would do so voluntarily. This could have be done without
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, at 06:03 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
I never got the impression that this was a matter of funding, Nick.
And while I completely understand that core developers enjoy working in 3
much more, it was decided to not accept any improvements for a +2.7
version even from
Am 17.01.2014 00:57, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On 17 Jan 2014 03:25, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
mailto:storch...@gmail.com wrote:
четвер, 16-січ-2014 15:03:28 Georg Brandl написано:
Am 16.01.2014 14:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
The question is less for us than for occasional
Am 17.01.2014 06:34, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, at 06:03 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
I never got the impression that this was a matter of funding, Nick.
And while I completely understand that core developers enjoy working in 3
much more, it was decided to not accept
On 01/16/2014 06:03 PM, � wrote:
And while I completely understand that core developers enjoy working in 3 much
more, it was decided to not accept any
improvements for a +2.7 version [...]
You mean, like, new features? Have any new features been put in 2.7 after it
hit feature freeze?
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
