Hi,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:47 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 09.01.2015 23:26, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW: How about having an "incubator" phase for new core devs ?
>>> The new candidate will get commit rights for say 3 mon
On 09.01.2015 23:52, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 09/01/2015 23:47, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
>>
>> Antoine and Victor argued that new developers should first
>> show their skills by submitting patches to tickets, working
>> with other core devs before getting the commit bit set.
>>
>> My suggestion
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 09/01/2015 23:47, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
> >
> > Antoine and Victor argued that new developers should first
> > show their skills by submitting patches to tickets, working
> > with other core devs before getting the commit bit set.
> >
Le 09/01/2015 23:47, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
>
> Antoine and Victor argued that new developers should first
> show their skills by submitting patches to tickets, working
> with other core devs before getting the commit bit set.
>
> My suggestion was allowing new developers to start committing
>
On 09.01.2015 23:26, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>
>> BTW: How about having an "incubator" phase for new core devs ?
>> The new candidate will get commit rights for say 3 months and
>> after those 3 months, the mentor then suggests whether m
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> BTW: How about having an "incubator" phase for new core devs ?
> The new candidate will get commit rights for say 3 months and
> after those 3 months, the mentor then suggests whether make
> the status permanent or not.
>
Not sure this
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> BTW: How about having an "incubator" phase for new core devs ?
> The new candidate will get commit rights for say 3 months and after those 3
> months, the mentor then suggests whether make the status permanent or not.
>
> As long as this is stated clearly from the beginning,
On 09.01.2015 12:47, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 7 January 2015 at 20:22, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> If David didn't contribute before, I'm against giving him directly the
>> developer access. Different people repeat that you don't need to have
>> the developer access to contribute. Send patches, revie
On 7 January 2015 at 20:22, Victor Stinner wrote:
> If David didn't contribute before, I'm against giving him directly the
> developer access. Different people repeat that you don't need to have
> the developer access to contribute. Send patches, review patches,
> comment issues, etc.
>
> We rejec
