Wait for Brett.
On Friday, April 29, 2016, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> On 04/29/2016 03:53 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> The primary debate should be about fspath or not. Inheriting from str is
> off the table while I'm BDFL. Removing pathlib from the stdlib would only
> be on the table if we ca
On 04/29/2016 03:53 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
The primary debate should be about fspath or not. Inheriting from str
is off the table while I'm BDFL. Removing pathlib from the stdlib
would only be on the table if we can't reach agreement on fspath.
WFM. Are there competing proposals for how
PEP has first draft done. Giving Koos and Stephen to comment on it before I
post it (I'll give them until Monday).
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, 15:46 Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>
> This month there were over 350 emails in python-dev with the word
> "pathlib" in the title. Yet, despite this massive online
The primary debate should be about fspath or not. Inheriting from str is
off the table while I'm BDFL. Removing pathlib from the stdlib would only
be on the table if we can't reach agreement on fspath.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>
> This month there were over 350 em
This month there were over 350 emails in python-dev with the word
"pathlib" in the title. Yet, despite this massive online debate, nobody
volunteered to present about pathlib at the language summit.
Based on Jake Edge's summary of the conversation from LWN.net we've
boiled down the debate
