On 3 June 2018 at 11:07, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Sounds to me like these are probably just past committers who are no
> longer active for whatever personal reasons, and took no action when we
> moved to GitHub. We basically never remove the commit bit from anyone
> except by request, and I
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 14:58 Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 12:47 Mariatta Wijaya
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> [SNIP]
> >>
> >>> 2. Better support for core developers in the tracker.
> >>
> >>
> >> Not sure what you
Sounds to me like these are probably just past committers who are no longer
active for whatever personal reasons, and took no action when we moved to
GitHub. We basically never remove the commit bit from anyone except by
request, and I only recall seeing one such request, ever. Some of them
Is that a 50% reduction or is that just 50% of the people who could be active
are?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/2018 12:46 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
>>
>> And perhaps this is to be discussed in a separate thread: even though in the
>>
On 06/02/2018 12:46 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
And perhaps this is to be discussed in a separate thread: even though in the
b.p.o we appear to have 170 committers,
really there are 90 core devs (people who has commit right to CPython on
GitHub). and out of those 90, I think only
about half
Reading the comments in the thread and having used Github issues
myself for a few years now, I find the idea of moving from a
dedicated issue tracker we can easily customize to our needs
(or hire someone to do so via the PSF) to a simplistic tracker
add-on, which Github issues is, not a very
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 12:47 Mariatta Wijaya
> wrote:
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>> 2. Better support for core developers in the tracker.
>>
>>
>> Not sure what you mean by "support"? There are only two maintainers of the
>> bug tracker, they
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 12:47 Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> 2. Better support for core developers in the tracker.
>
>
> Not sure what you mean by "support"? There are only two maintainers of the
> bug tracker, they both are also Python core developers: Brett and Ezio. My
> personal opinion
>
> "Old and languishing issues should just be closed / ignored"
> I disagree with doing this blindly, and I would be mightily annoyed if
> someone did so with IDLE issues and hide valuable ideas and code.
Since you are IDLE's maintainer, I'll also be annoyed if other people
except yourself (or
I think boards have improved since I last used them, but when I tried they
added nothing but overhead. Possibly useful for planning, if we had someone who
was responsible for that (maybe individual planning? But then you can’t really
expect contributors to keep it up to date for you).
10 matches
Mail list logo
