On 25Mar2019 1503, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 25.03.2019 16:20, Steve Dower wrote:
To be clear, my pushback (on Discourse, since I can only send email from
an actual laptop these days but can participate over there from my
phone) has been against vague nominations, not the individuals themselves.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:20 PM Steve Dower wrote:
>
> On 25Mar2019 0217, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> > I must say, I'm a bit surprised by the discussion around the voting
> > process and the candidates.
> >
> > First, we've been complaining about lack of core devs for a long
> > time. Now we have two
On 25Mar2019 0217, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
I must say, I'm a bit surprised by the discussion around the voting
process and the candidates.
First, we've been complaining about lack of core devs for a long
time. Now we have two great candidates with proven track record of
contributing to Python and
24.03.19 23:23, Victor Stinner пише:
Cython became a major project in the Python community (see the PSF
award). I noticed that sometimes Cython is slow to be updated to
support new Python changes (like the new way to store exceptions in
PyThreadState of Python 3.7).
It is not slow. But it took
24.03.19 20:27, Terry Reedy пише:
Have you asked Stefan if he would like the privilege, accept it, and
would at least occasionally use it?
Actually it is Stefan who asked me to promote him. So he is definitely
would like.
___
python-committers
24.03.19 18:40, Antoine Pitrou пише:
I don't know. If he's not very active in writing or reviewing PRs, then
perhaps he doesn't _need_ core developer rights.
I understand you. He does not _need_ core developer rights just for
this. But I have a grounded hope that Stefan can be the next
I must say, I'm a bit surprised by the discussion around the voting
process and the candidates.
First, we've been complaining about lack of core devs for a long
time. Now we have two great candidates with proven track record of
contributing to Python and people complain again. As a small group,
