[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

Hi Brett, You can put my name as Contact of all Fedora and RHEL platforms. Note: Fedora "Rawhide" is the rolling release and it's common that these buildbots are broken by kernel, compiler or glibc updates, rather than actual Python regressions. Time to time, it detects real Python regressions. T

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:45 AM Brett Cannon wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:16 AM Paul Moore wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:09, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: >> > >> > On 11.03.2022 17:42, Zachary Ware wrote: >> > > >> > > - Only code which either supports a higher-tier platform or is

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:16 AM Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:09, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > > > > On 11.03.2022 17:42, Zachary Ware wrote: > > > > > > - Only code which either supports a higher-tier platform or is a > general improvement may be checked in. > > > > My understand

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:43 AM Zachary Ware wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 7:45 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > > If there are people in the community who wish to provide support for > > these platforms, I don't see a reason not to keep them in a tier 4. > > Such platforms would not be support

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:38 AM Christian Heimes wrote: > On 11/03/2022 00.35, Brett Cannon wrote: > > I brought this up on python-dev at > > > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@python.org/thread/ZPBSHENP3V7KHNPYWE6BEQD5ASES2NLV/ > > < > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:26 AM Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 11. 03. 22 0:35, Brett Cannon wrote: > > I brought this up on python-dev at > > > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@python.org/thread/ZPBSHENP3V7KHNPYWE6BEQD5ASES2NLV/ > > < > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 1:18 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > I think the list is missing some important platforms which we do > support (looking at configure): > > * Linux on 32-bit ARM platforms, e.g. for Raspberry Pis > * Linux on Android > * AIX > * Cygwin > * NetBSD/OpenBSD > * musl instead of

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11/03/2022 18.08, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: All other platforms === - Only code which either supports a higher-tier platform or is a general improvement may be checked in. My understanding of that sentence is: PRs which target platforms not listed in PEP 11 may not be check

[python-committers] Python Language Summit at PyCon 2022 in Salt Lake City

We're excited to announce that the signups for Python Language Summit at PyCon 2022 are now open. Full details at: https://us.pycon.org/2022/events/language-summit/ After two years of virtual/online summit, we will be returning to in-person format. We will be following the health and safety guide

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:09, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > > On 11.03.2022 17:42, Zachary Ware wrote: > > > > - Only code which either supports a higher-tier platform or is a general > > improvement may be checked in. > > My understanding of that sentence is: PRs which target platforms > not liste

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11.03.2022 17:42, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 7:45 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: >> If there are people in the community who wish to provide support for >> these platforms, I don't see a reason not to keep them in a tier 4. >> Such platforms would not be supported by the core t

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 7:45 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > If there are people in the community who wish to provide support for > these platforms, I don't see a reason not to keep them in a tier 4. > Such platforms would not be supported by the core team and don't > necessarily need a buildbot (e

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11.03.2022 13:52, Christian Heimes wrote: > On 11/03/2022 10.18, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: >> I think the list is missing some important platforms which we do >> support (looking at configure): >> >> * Linux on 32-bit ARM platforms, e.g. for Raspberry Pis >> * Linux on Android >> * AIX >> * Cygw

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11/03/2022 10.18, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: I think the list is missing some important platforms which we do support (looking at configure): * Linux on 32-bit ARM platforms, e.g. for Raspberry Pis * Linux on Android * AIX * Cygwin * NetBSD/OpenBSD * musl instead of glibc for Linux, e.g. for A

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11/03/2022 00.35, Brett Cannon wrote: I brought this up on python-dev at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@python.org/thread/ZPBSHENP3V7KHNPYWE6BEQD5ASES2NLV/ , and the feedb

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

On 11. 03. 22 0:35, Brett Cannon wrote: I brought this up on python-dev at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-...@python.org/thread/ZPBSHENP3V7KHNPYWE6BEQD5ASES2NLV/ , and the feedba

[python-committers] Re: Proposed tiered platform support

I think the list is missing some important platforms which we do support (looking at configure): * Linux on 32-bit ARM platforms, e.g. for Raspberry Pis * Linux on Android * AIX * Cygwin * NetBSD/OpenBSD * musl instead of glibc for Linux, e.g. for Alpine images In general, I believe we should add