r this.
>
> A timeout on a job still marks it as failed, I presume, so we still have to
> restart all jobs... :-(
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:40 PM Alex Gaynor wrote:
>>
>> Github actions doesn't have the ability to restart individual jobs,
>> sadly (I&#x
Github actions doesn't have the ability to restart individual jobs,
sadly (I've asked for this when they've done research sessions).
FWIW, I'd recommend adding a timeout to jobs (it can be set in the YML
file), that way hung jobs don't hang for hours and hours.
Alex
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:16
It was sent to all of python-committers as a heads up that _someone_ was
banned.
I didn't follow the thread in question, so this is all a little opaque to
me, I have no idea who we're talking about or what their conduct is. I
assume that's intentional.
Alex
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:40 PM Ivan
There's a link that does that on _github_. (On mobile, sorry for terseness).
Alex
On Tue, May 21, 2019, 2:10 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> How can I restart a failed build on Azure?
>
> https://dev.azure.com/Python/cpython/_build/results?buildId=43161&view=logs&j=18d1a34d-6940-5fc1-f5
Would it make sense to work with the PSF infra staff so that
miss-isslington is hooked up to the PSF Sentry account so folks can get
email notifications and similar on unhandled exceptions?
Alex
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:02 PM Mariatta wrote:
> There was an error from Redis. I think this is the
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13192
Thanks gps!
Alex
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Ok, apparently the SSL cert on self-signed.pythontest.net was changed
> but it wasn't updated in our source tree, hence the failure.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 08/05/2
Tests for that PR would presumably be green :-)
Alex
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Eric V. Smith wrote:
> Surely there must be some way around it. After all, how would you merge a
> PR to fix this test?
>
> --
> Eric V. Smith
> True Blade Systems, Inc
> (301) 859-4544
>
> On May 8, 2019, at 1
tic. Apparently the test which connects to
> "self-signed.pythontest.net" always fails now with a "self-signed
> certificate" error...
>
> Le 08/05/2019 à 17:37, Alex Gaynor a écrit :
> > Are these intermittent failures, or is there bustage on master right
Are these intermittent failures, or is there bustage on master right now?
My usual habit on other projects (I'm not very active on CPython these
days) is to restart the build on travis so that is a nice green checkmark.
Alex
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:32 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
I think you're dramatically overestimating a) the possibility that someone
would attempt to use the CoC process frivolously, b) the possibility that
the CoC WG would act on such a complaint without good cause.
FWIW I was involved in removing a core developer from another community for
CoC violatio
Is there a copy of the original email? (I'm not a regular python-ideas
reader)
Based on Brett's description though, the content sounds very far over the
line, and I wouldn't want to interfere with the WG's decision.
Alex
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm cho
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:24 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> Right, and your proposal means I now have to judge proposed core
> developers on which side of popular opinion they will come down on in hopes
> that they vote in ways I agree with and
Is there documentation somewhere on "how to create a release branch" that
we should add "creating a label" step to?
Alex
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> I noticed that there is a 3.7 branch now.
> So you can use this label if you want miss-islington to backport a PR to
nchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1741768
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 06/01/2018 à 20:42, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> > On Jan 6, 2018, at 14:00, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Antoine,
> >>
> >> Assuming you're on Firefo
Hey Antoine,
Assuming you're on Firefox57, it requires a pref -- once the WebAuthn spec
is finalized we'll drop the pref --
https://mobile.twitter.com/jamespugjones/status/91231495223226
Alex
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, for the record (even though
If you look at the travis-ui, do you see little "restart" arrows (example
attached)? Those are what do it -- I went ahead and restarted the failed
job on this one.
Alex
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to merge this: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/5113
They require a preference to be enabled, but yeah, Security Keys in Firefox
Quantum 🎉
https://mobile.twitter.com/jamespugjones/status/91231495223226
Alex
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> If some people are inclined to push for 2FA, I think it would be more
> produ
The reason for the username-then-a-new-page-for-password flow in many cases
is that the sites have multiple flows depending on your username! The GMail
login page for example can send you to either the password page since
you're a consumer account, the password page because you're a GSuite
account
It's possible to generate a key on a regular computer and transfer it to a
YubiKey if you prefer. (It's not like software key generation has been
flawless either; [OpenSSL/Debian fiasco]. Oh well, such is life).
Even if you're not going to put your SSH keys on a YubiKey, I _strongly_
encourage fol
Someone needs to invite him to this list :-)
On Dec 6, 2017 11:44 AM, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
> I think I figured it out -- I invited him to the python org on GitHub.
> Anything else?
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> OK, let's make it so. It's been a long time
I also feel this decision was a mistake. If there's a consensus to revert,
I'm happy to draft a PEP.
Alex
On Nov 6, 2017 1:58 PM, "Neil Schemenauer" wrote:
> On 2017-11-06, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Gah, seven years on from Python 2.7's release, I still get caught by
> > that. I'm tempted to prop
On other projects I work on, my usual practice is to restart the Travis job
and wait for it to pass.
Alex
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> What is the recommended way of merging a PR when Travis-CI failed for
> unrelated reasons? (apparently an external NNTP
Can we please use a phrase for re-triggering a review that makes more sense
like "I've updated the patch, please re-review", rather than magic inside
baseball language?
Alex
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I noticed today that out of about 19 pages of issues, only the firs
If you find a macOS CI platform with more capacity, please let me know :-)
Travis has been totally underwater of late, but I don't know of any
alternatives; probably because operating a fleet of macOS builders is a
giant pain. You need Apple hardware, and it turns out you can either
purchase a tra
This is a great UX win for our development process. Thanks for making this
happen!
Alex
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The cherry picker bot has just been deployed to CPython repo, codenamed
> miss-islington.
>
> miss-islington made the very first backport PR f
The other big advantage to using teams is that they'll automatically apply
to all branches.
Alex
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 17:09, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> > Marietta, Brett, thanks for your work!
>
> Indeed!
>
> > I suggested teams to make the
Great, thanks for digging in!
Alex
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Alex Gaynor
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It looks like appveyor
Hi all,
It looks like appveyor tests are currently failing on all builds (something
about UNC paths + imports). Was appveyor enabled recently, or did the test
regress?
Alex
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizi
Carol's also served on the PSF board of directors for a number of years. +1
Alex
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> While at the PyCon US sprints the idea came up of offering Carol Willing
> developer privileges. Everyone at the table -- about 6 of us -- liked the
> idea and
Travis's macOS builds aren't as slow as they used to be, between them
adding capacity and our queue increase.
Alex
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to get faster OS X builds with our connections at Travis-CI?
> I agree that OS X builds are usually very
I'll be another voice saying that the CoC isn't the right mechanism -- the
CoC is for harassment and abuse (at least, most community's CoCs are, the
Python one is pretty vague).
That said, I have no problem with the action taken, banning people who are
extremely unproductive is a necessary step fo
If most patches (by LOC) don't require domain knowledge to commit, I guess
they probably don't need domain knowledge to review.
Alex
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 at 10:04 Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Barry Warsaw
That suggests an interesting question: Why is the Touched It Last so
different from the domain expert :-)
Alex
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 01:12 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> >Since there doesn't seem to be strong support I'm leaning towards
> switc
I'm obviously not very active in CPython development these days, but
actively tracking the impact of each PR on coverage has been extremely
useful in every other project I've worked on.
It's the best way to automatically ensure PRs are not regressing coverage
too much, and doesn't require much man
Probably the easiest thing is to point the linkifier at our own webservice
that just does:
if hash not in cache:
try:
requests.head("github.com/hash")
except requests.error:
try:
request.head("hg.python.org/hash")
except request.error:
re
My git clone is 350MB (after a make clean), a fresh hg clone is 650MB.
Alex
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 01/01/2016 08:24 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > If you want to read the reasons I chose GitHub over GitLab,
> > see
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow
+1
Alex
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> > On Jan 4, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >
> > I once looked at it and decided it wasn't something I wanted to touch ;)
> so
> > paying Eric to do it might not be a bad idea.
>
>
> I’d prefer it if we didn’t financiall
For Django this has literally never come up.
Alex
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Another idea I had is could someone reach out to another project like
> Django or Go that switched to GitHub and see how they handled this
> situation for contributors? I don't feel I'm in a
Brett (and everyone else),
Thanks so much for all the time you put into working through this decision!
Alex
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> If you want to read the reasons I chose GitHub over GitLab, see
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-January/00034
security@ seems like the right address, since at a minimum we have all the
people who'll know where to route the issue to.
Alex
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, at 18:23, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 19/06/2014 21:13, Nick Coghlan a écri
Hi all,
I'd like to propose Brian Kearns for commit. He's been a committer on PyPy
for about a year and a half now, and in particular he's done a bunch of
"Python version" works: things like upgrading us from the 2.7.3 stdlib to
the 2.7.6 stdlib, and py3k work. He's interested in having commit for
While I'm not a particularly active python-developer, I have spent quite a
bit of time using OpenStack's Zuul/gerrit system/workflow and all I can say
is it: It is the right way to write software. Huge +1 from me on every
project using it :-)
Alex
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Nick Coghlan
These steps sound right to me. Make the notification a private email, not a
public one -- this doesn't have to be a big deal. It's not a warning shot
to other people, this is one isolated individual, and we should treat it as
such.
Alex
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On
I'm not sure if it's because I'm reading the lists more, or if he's
actually posting more, but I definitely seem to see him more frequently.
And almost none of it is positive contribution, it's almost entirely people
wasting time trying to humor him. I'm honestly not sure I've ever seen a
discussio
Yes, we probably should. The Django project was contacted by them, I've
we've been working with them to set up a workflow, when I saw this I'd
assumed someone had been contacted for CPython.
Alex
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 07.11.2013 11:45, schrieb M.-A. Lembur
+1 from me, Donald is doing awesome work in this area.
Alex
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Donald is the current main developer for PyPI and is doing a lot of
> work on PyPI related PEPs this days - it would reduce the
> administrative overhead if he could update the re
I'll be there for the summit, conference, and murphy willing sprints.
Alex
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chris Jerdonek > wrote:
>
>> Is the attendee list for next March's PyCon available to registrants?
>> What core developer
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> Hello Python Committers,
>
> As usual we will hold a Python Language Summit before the PyCon US
> conference.
>
> The language summit will be in the conference hotel, to discuss the
> ongoing development of the Python language. It will be hel
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:22 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I added a boolean flag to the bug tracker indicating what user accounts
> belong to committers. Please check that the flag is set in Your Details,
> Is Committer. If it's not, please let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
> _
49 matches
Mail list logo
