Re: [python-committers] Fw: CoC violation (was: Retire or reword the "Beautiful is better than ugly" Zen clause)

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:07 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > I don't know of specifically French linguistic taboos, so I'm unable to > answer this. French culture generally doesn't ban words wholesale, even > when used in quotes. The very idea that you can't *quote* something > despicable is forei

Re: [python-committers] Transfer of power

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:04 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > That might be a minority view, but I don't think anyone except Guido > would be legitimate as a Python BDFL. > +1 ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.pyt

Re: [python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?

-1 On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment > Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the > talk at the Language Summit: > >https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/ > > The poll

Re: [python-committers] Proposal for procedures regarding CoC actions

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > * The other is tasked with handling rare one-off situations where the > stated goals are considering the needs of the community, being respectful > as possible to all parties, and doing what they can to mit

Re: [python-committers] Proposal for procedures regarding CoC actions

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Raymond Hettinger < raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I propose that when someone thinks there is a problem serious enough to > warrant a Code-of-Conduct action, that it get referred to a group of three > people to make the decision. This reminds me of

Re: [python-committers] Making the PSF CoC apply to core developers

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:36 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 04:10:08 +, Brett Cannon wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 18:01 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > > So let me make it clear: Brett, and the other list maintainers, you're > > > not listening. Even if I'm a minority of

Re: [python-committers] More explicit Code of Conduct for the issue tracker & core mailing lists?

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Would folks mind if I drafted a CPython Code of Conduct inspired by > their example, and proposed it for inclusion in the Developer's Guide? > The language of the FreeBSD Code of Conduct is a pretty heavy CYA-style corporate legalese, but t

Re: [python-committers] Alexander Belopolsky

n Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:36 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> >> Alexander Belopolsky wrote: >> > FWIW, here is what Martin wrote to me ~ 1.5 years ago. If the form >> > has not been found by now, it probably cannot be found at all. I >> > have no problem resubmit

Re: [python-committers] Alexander Belopolsky

rd this to appropriate > people. It's known that the records of the contributor agreements are not current. I'm working (slowly) on fixing that. Regads, Martin """""""""""""""""" On Thu, Sep 20, 201

Re: [python-committers] New core developer

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I'd like to propose Serhiy Storchaka as a new core developer. +1 ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Re: [python-committers] English 'precise' is only an adjective, not a verb.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> For the benefit of people who are not native-English speakers and who >> wish to write literate English: The English word 'precise' is only an >> adjective, and not a verb, so the above does not work as an English >> sentence. >> I find

Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: .. > Ok, I've found a later message: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-August/090959.html > This post precedes the creation of py3k-datetime branch, so no wonder that it was not mentioned. I wonder, though why sandbox was no

Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: .. > A quick search found the following message by Dirkjan, but it is likely > earlier messages on the subject had been posted too: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-July/090325.html > No wonder I missed that. I assume you a

Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: .. > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches > (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if > Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where > they were made in the S

Re: [python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion

-vu Lib/datetime.py | awk '{print $1,$2}'| sort | uniq -c 2112 Alexander Belopolsky It looks like this history survived the cvs to svn migration, but was lost in migration to hg. ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

[python-committers] History lost in svn to hg conversion

I am not sure where to report such issues, so I'll post it here. Please advise if another list is more appropriate. When I committed Lib/datetime.py to svn, I made sure that it was done in a way that preserved the history of that file going back to 2002. However, hg log of this file starts with my

Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] Code Simplicity » Open Source Community, Simplified

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > On 02/02/2011 23:35, Steve Holden wrote: >> >> On Feb 2, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Barry Warsaw  wrote: On Feb 03, 2011, at 08:54 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I suspect this pr

Re: [python-committers] Commit privileges for Eli Bendersky

+1 On Jan 8, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > +1 > > > On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > >> Two years ago, Eli Bendersky submitted to the tracker one of several >> duplicate reports about problems with difflib.SequenceMatcher. After I >> consolidated and closed

Re: [python-committers] Blocking feature backports

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:48 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >> .. So is it alright if I make >> the commits and simply note in the commit messages that they are for a >> new feature and should not be merged backwards? > > I think that's fine.  I'm not even sure it is necessary to mention > that it is a

Re: [python-committers] trunk is open

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: .. > those of you who choose to observe commit freezes may now > again commit to trunk. I assume you meant "to the py3k branch." ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: .. > Good luck (and justice!) with your (both) thesis. Uhmmm, what is the > plural for thesis, in english?. In Spanish it is the same word, changing > the prefix article: "la tesis"/"las tesis" :). "theses" - isn't English fun? __

Re: [python-committers] Eric Araujo (merwok) as Distutils commiter

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: .. > I would like to propose Eric (merwok on IRC) as a commiter to work on > Distutils. +1 ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python

Re: [python-committers] New comitter proposal: Terry Reedy

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I'd like to propose Terry Reedy as a new comitter. > +1 In fact, I was surprised to learn that Terry was not a committer. ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.

Re: [python-committers] 2.7 almost out the door

The "What’s New in Python 2.7" document says "Python 2.7 was released on July 7, 2010." Is this a typo or you plan a 4-day cool off period before making an announcement? On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2.7 has been tagged, and I have uploaded docs and the source tarba