On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7 Dec, 2008, at 2:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ronald> * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x
>>
>> Brett> That requirement right there take me out for being able to to do
>> Brett> the binary.
>>
>> Jesse> I coul
On 7 Dec, 2008, at 2:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronald> * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x
Brett> That requirement right there take me out for being able to
to do
Brett> the binary.
Jesse> I could do binaries for 10.5 and forward. I've got a few
macs at
Jesse> my disposal
I
FWIW, I have a 2.6.1 installer here which I've tested on a few machines.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>>
>>Martin> Yes,
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
>Martin> Yes, it's broken.
>
>Skip> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
>Martin> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
>Jesse> My 10.5 buildbot should
Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
Martin> Yes, it's broken.
Skip> Was it a G4 perhaps?
Martin> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
Jesse> My 10.5 buildbot should still be active at very least.
I was thinking that maybe it could se
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
> Yes, it's broken.
>
>> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
My 10.5 buildbot should still be ac
> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
Yes, it's broken.
> Was it a G4 perhaps?
I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.
Ronald> * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x
Brett> That requirement right there take me out for being able to to do
Brett> the binary.
Jesse> I could do binaries for 10.5 and forward. I've got a few macs at
Jesse> my disposal
I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone? W
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>
> How
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
How does that sounds?
>>>
>>> Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 6, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:40, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
I haven't even looked seriously at 3.0 yet an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 5, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald?
(the 2.6.1 release page cla
On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:40, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
I haven't even looked seriously at 3.0 yet and therefore wouldn't be
the rigth person to build OSX binaries at the moment.
Specifically,
On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald?
(t
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How does that sounds?
>
> Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular basis?
>
> Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald?
> (the 2.6.1 release page claims that they are s
> How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular basis?
Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald?
(the 2.6.1 release page claims that they are signed with Benjamin's
key, but no binary is even available. Before this gets fixed,
Barry Warsaw schrieb:
> => python-committers
>
> On Dec 5, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>>> In the meantime, I'll make sure Georg is involved in point releases
>>> moving forward.
>
>> That's good. Thanks!
>
> I think the way I'd like to handle this is through the python-
> committe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
=> python-committers
On Dec 5, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
In the meantime, I'll make sure Georg is involved in point releases
moving forward.
That's good. Thanks!
I think the way I'd like to handle this is through the python-
commit
18 matches
Mail list logo
