On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:11 AM Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> >> Where possible, should we retroactively make existing
> >> keywords contextual?
> >
> > The benefit of contextual keywords is being able to choose popular
> method/function/variable names as new keywords
> > without a disruptive depre
On 2/8/21 3:02 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 8:18 am Terry Reedy wrote:
>> The one thing I think needs to be discussed and not been much, at least
>> not publicly that I have seen, is whether we really want to go down the
>> road of contextual keywords. There are some negatives a
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 8:18 am Terry Reedy, wrote:
>
> The one thing I think needs to be discussed and not been much, at least
> not publicly that I have seen, is whether we really want to go down the
> road of contextual keywords. There are some negatives as well as
> positives. Just because the
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 6:21 am Python Steering Council, <
steering-coun...@python.org> wrote:
> After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to announce
> that we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion PEPs 635 and 636,
> collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs. We
On 2/8/2021 3:07 PM, Python Steering Council wrote:
After much deliberation, the Python Steering Council is happy to announce that
we have chosen to accept PEP 634, and its companion PEPs 635 and 636,
collectively known as the Pattern Matching PEPs.
Thank you for your collective time and effo
