On 11.12.2019 20:19, Brett Cannon wrote:
> As for the "please email everyone personally", I just don't have the time to
> email 30 people that Giampolo listed or the 89 total people who could vote
> but didn't commit or author something in the past two years . But do note
> that me lacking the t
On Dec 11, 2019, at 02:28, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I had not expected to be delisted and thus did not
> check the voters list.
I didn’t expect to be delisted either but I’m sufficiently paranoid to have
double checked that I was still on the voter list.
Cheers,
-Barry
signatur
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:31 PM Mariatta wrote:
> Re: notifying and sending email to people who were marked as inactive by
> the script.
> We can send automated email via Zapier. Let me know how I can help with
> this part.
>
I think an automated email to the candidates for removal which is very
Thanks Brett.
Re: notifying and sending email to people who were marked as inactive by
the script.
We can send automated email via Zapier. Let me know how I can help with
this part.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:20 AM Brett Cannon wrote:
> I want to make two quick points and then I'm bowing out
I want to make two quick points and then I'm bowing out of this conversation as
this isn't going to change anything for this vote beyond the exemption we have
already granted and no changes to PEP 13 have been proposed. I was trying to
avoid this conversation dragging out right now, but people k
On 11.12.2019 00:58, Brett Cannon wrote:
> We discussed the situation on the steering council and we are fine with
> making an exception for folks who felt caught off-guard asking Ernest to be
> added to the voter roll even though voting has already started.
Thanks.
> In the new year I will wor
Le mer. 11 déc. 2019 à 01:00, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> We discussed the situation on the steering council and we are fine with
> making an exception for folks who felt caught off-guard asking Ernest to be
> added to the voter roll even though voting has already started.
>
> In the new year I wil
On 10.12.2019 23:57, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 06:52, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> The conversion to an inactive dev is something that core devs need
>> to be asked to agree to, and thus needs to be managed as a status
>> flag, not depend on commits to the repo.
>
> All committers w
FWIW, since my name appears here: despite my lack of public contributions
lately I do not consider myself inactive in any way since I’ve been continually
working and cooperating with a lot of people in non-public ways. Whether it was
the push for fixing ssl in 2014 or my help with designing data
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 4:52 AM M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Regardless of the logic, I also find it highly questionable that
> core devs who are no longer committing to the repo, but have put in
> quite a bit of time into the project get their voting rights removed.
>
> Even when not actively maintain
We discussed the situation on the steering council and we are fine with making
an exception for folks who felt caught off-guard asking Ernest to be added to
the voter roll even though voting has already started.
In the new year I will work with Ernest to draft up a proposal for changing PEP
13
Le 10/12/2019 à 23:57, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 06:52, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> The conversion to an inactive dev is something that core devs need
>> to be asked to agree to, and thus needs to be managed as a status
>> flag, not depend on commits to the repo.
>
> All commit
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 06:52, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> The conversion to an inactive dev is something that core devs need
> to be asked to agree to, and thus needs to be managed as a status
> flag, not depend on commits to the repo.
All committers were asked to check the voter list in mid-November,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 21:07, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>
> > As it turns out I was removed from the list of voters by the above
> > script, without being asked, and would like to be added back again.
>
> I support this, and I hope this can be rectified for this election period
> itself.
+1 from me
> As it turns out I was removed from the list of voters by the above
> script, without being asked, and would like to be added back again.
I support this, and I hope this can be rectified for this election
period itself.
Thank you,
Senthil
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:52 PM M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
