[python-committers] Re: Refleak tests in CI

2022-01-28 Thread Pablo Galindo Salgado
> Is there a possible middle ground here? Rather than a required PR check (or a full buildbot run), maybe we could just add a new “magic” label that runs a single refleak job using the GitHub actions runners. That sounds like a good compromise and it will be strictly better than the current setup.

[python-committers] Re: Refleak tests in CI

2022-01-28 Thread Brandt Bucher
Is there a possible middle ground here? Rather than a required PR check (or a full buildbot run), maybe we could just add a new “magic” label that runs a single refleak job using the GitHub actions runners. ___ python-committers mailing list -- python-c

[python-committers] Re: Refleak tests in CI

2022-01-28 Thread Pablo Galindo Salgado
> > > It is nigh impossible to pick out errors in a PR from flaky tests, > flaky machines and pre-existing errors. I agree with the sentiment but is certainly not that dramatic. We (people watching the build bots) do it on a regular basis, and many contributors do it very efficiently as well. I a