Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/23/2011 9:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form-python/
and
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/
It looks like the first one is old, because
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ points to the second one.
I believe
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:40:44 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
The second one is the one we currently use. It does not
have the clause to cover past contributions, since we now
expect contributors to sign the CLA before the contributions
go into the repository.
Note that this rarely
R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:40:44 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
The second one is the one we currently use. It does not
have the clause to cover past contributions, since we now
expect contributors to sign the CLA before the contributions
go into the
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form-python/
and
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/
It looks like the first one is old, because
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ points to the second one.
Victor
___
python-committers mailing
On 3/23/2011 9:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form-python/
and
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/
It looks like the first one is old, because
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ points to the second one.
I believe you are right. The only
We should ask the pydotorg list to fix this. Should we at the same time requet
the assition of a field for the committer's user name?
regards
Steve
On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:41 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 3/23/2011 9:31 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
