Christian Heimes schrieb:
Georg Brandl schrieb:
David Goodger schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 14:56, R. David Murrayrdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
I can see it now...the TV and movie track at PyCon 2010,
with attendance mandatory for anyone wanting to participate
in the Core sprint...
We
Le jeudi 02 juillet 2009 à 11:43 -0700, Brett Cannon a écrit :
Considering Georg just discovered Fawlty Towers I think we might need
to have required British humour training for all core committers.
I object to the British humour monopoly. I know as a fact that Georg
likes French humour a lot
David Goodger schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 14:56, R. David Murrayrdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
I can see it now...the TV and movie track at PyCon 2010,
with attendance mandatory for anyone wanting to participate
in the Core sprint...
We actually had a room or two for evening videos at a
Georg Brandl schrieb:
David Goodger schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 14:56, R. David Murrayrdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
I can see it now...the TV and movie track at PyCon 2010,
with attendance mandatory for anyone wanting to participate
in the Core sprint...
We actually had a room or two for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Speaking as a past release manager, the reason that things like that
didn't get merged is because... drumroll... no-one merged them.
Ughhh. This is actually a good reason to migrate to mercurial, were
merges are painless :-).
2009/7/2 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org:
-On [20090702 17:15], Jesus Cea (j...@jcea.es) wrote:
Ughhh. This is actually a good reason to migrate to mercurial, were
merges are painless :-).
For all I know Mercurial doesn't make the issue of resolving content merges
easier,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/7/2 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org:
-On [20090702 17:15], Jesus Cea (j...@jcea.es) wrote:
Ughhh. This is actually a good reason to migrate to mercurial, were
merges are painless :-).
For all I
2009/7/2 Anthony Baxter anthonybax...@gmail.com
The particulars of the revision control system don't matter as much as the
discipline of teaching people to commit fixes. Right now, we have 2.6.x,
3.0.x and 3.1.x.
If I remember correctly I believe we decided at the language summit that 3.0
is
On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
If I remember correctly I believe we decided at the language summit
that 3.0
is just dead now that 3.1 is out and we shouldn't even bother with
another
point release since 3.1 followed 3.0 so closely and didn't introduce
any new
syntax or
On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
If Barry is up for it I am not against it, but if we do go with it I
think it should be a quickie release and then retire 3.0.x completely.
It's not difficult to actually cut the release. What is a pain is
managing all the bugs leading up to
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:42, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
mailto:ba...@python.org wrote:
On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Anthony Baxter wrote:
I think Barry should totally cut a completely pointless 3.0.2
release. We
can call it the
11 matches
Mail list logo
