On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> >>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> >>> a version of sphinx that is included in
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
>> have a specific fix in mind?
>
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> a version of
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
a version of sphinx that is included in the d
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>>> specific revision that you would like to
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
> have a specific fix in mind?
the specific change was committed
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
>> h
I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
have a specific fix in mind? I suspect few people here understand the
(apparently largely politic
Hi,
the requirement to build the documentation using a sphinx version from the trunk
was merged to at least the 2.6 branch. This is clearly not a bug fix. Is it
really necessary to rely on a trunk/unreleased version? Would it be possible to
revert this change?
Background: The Debian distribution
10 matches
Mail list logo