Re: [python-committers] Mercurial commit url is broken

2017-02-17 Thread Ezio Melotti
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I clicked on a Mercurial commit number from: > http://bugs.python.org/issue18383#msg249581 > > It points me to: > http://hg.python.org/lookup/c1396d28c440 > FTR the URL works now -- not sure if someone fixed it in the meanwhile. Be

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial commit url is broken

2017-02-16 Thread Brett Cannon
I'm going on vacation in literally 10 minutes, so the best I can do is tell you is that a copy of the code can be found at https://gist.github.com/brettcannon/f8d97c92b0df264cd4db008ffd32daf9 and it's possible I screwed up the static JSON data file that I had the infrastructure team install with th

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial 3.1 and 2.6 branches are not "inactive"

2014-10-15 Thread Ned Deily
In article <20141015165846.2b7a7...@limelight.wooz.org>, Barry Warsaw wrote: > 2.6 for sure. I don't know what actually has to happen to mark them closed, > but there will not be another 2.6 release. Benjamin has taken care of closing both the 2.6 and 3.1 branches. RIP -- Ned Deily, n...@ac

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial 3.1 and 2.6 branches are not "inactive"

2014-10-15 Thread Jesus Cea
On 15/10/14 22:58, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 15, 2014, at 01:47 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > >> Since both 2.6 and 3.1 are now retired, their branches should be marked >> as closed at this point, like earlier retired releases. Barry? >> Benjamin? > > 2.6 for sure. I don't know what actually has

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial 3.1 and 2.6 branches are not "inactive"

2014-10-15 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 15, 2014, at 01:47 PM, Ned Deily wrote: >Since both 2.6 and 3.1 are now retired, their branches should be marked >as closed at this point, like earlier retired releases. Barry? >Benjamin? 2.6 for sure. I don't know what actually has to happen to mark them closed, but there will not be

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial 3.1 and 2.6 branches are not "inactive"

2014-10-15 Thread Ned Deily
In article <543ed795.3010...@jcea.es>, Jesus Cea wrote: > Mercurial branches 3.1 and 2.6 are not "inactive". They are not "merged": > > """ > [jcea@babylon5 cpython]$ hg branches > default93408:fd658692db3a > 2.793384:7ba47bbfe38d > 3.1

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou
> My question, actually, is why to hurry using "generaldelta". We could > wait three more months until it is declared "official". Maybe Antoine > idea, that would make sense, is python.org being a tester to help to > actually test "generaldelta" to qualify for production. The prime motivation is

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-05 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/11 08:36, Georg Brandl wrote: > parentdelta was removed in favor of generaldelta... and you can't > really get *more* general :) > > But even if it was removed, you can always (using clone --pull > locally) create a clone that doesn't use tha

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-04 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 05.07.2011 04:08, schrieb Jesus Cea: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/07/11 21:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> I've upgraded the Mercurial version on hg.python.org to 1.9. Also, >> I've enabled the experimental "generaldelta" repository feature on >> the server, which m

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-04 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 04.07.2011 23:03, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 22:51 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman a écrit : >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 21:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> > I've upgraded the Mercurial version on hg.python.org to 1.9. >> > Also, I've enabled the experimental "generaldelta" repos

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-04 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/11 21:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I've upgraded the Mercurial version on hg.python.org to 1.9. Also, > I've enabled the experimental "generaldelta" repository feature on > the server, which makes the repository smaller (down from ~350 MB to

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-04 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 22:51 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman a écrit : > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 21:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > I've upgraded the Mercurial version on hg.python.org to 1.9. > > Also, I've enabled the experimental "generaldelta" repository feature on > > the server, which makes the rep

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial upgrade

2011-07-04 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 21:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > I've upgraded the Mercurial version on hg.python.org to 1.9. > Also, I've enabled the experimental "generaldelta" repository feature on > the server, which makes the repository smaller (down from ~350 MB to > ~190 MB), regardless of the client

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial

2011-02-08 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Also, I've finished converting (after Nick started it) the developer's > FAQ to display instructions for hg. Reviewing it is welcome; I put a > build here: > http://potrou.net/hgdevguide/faq.html Thanks for that - it definitely gives us a so

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial

2011-02-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le lundi 07 février 2011 à 09:25 -0800, Daniel Stutzbach a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:12 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" > wrote: > - Make local clones, one per branch, and then push across > them. > > > Like Victor, I have been using git to talk to the Python SVN servers > for so

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-04 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jack Diederich wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Belopolsky >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: >>> .. Good luck (and justice!) with your (both) thesis. Uhm

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-04 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jack Diederich wrote: > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Belopolsky > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: >> .. >>> Good luck (and justice!) with your (both) thesis. Uhmmm, what is the >>> plural for thesis, in english?. In Spani

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-04 Thread Jack Diederich
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: > .. >> Good luck (and justice!) with your (both) thesis. Uhmmm, what is the >> plural for thesis, in english?. In Spanish it is the same word, changing >> the prefix article: "la tesi

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-01 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jesus Cea wrote: .. > Good luck (and justice!) with your (both) thesis. Uhmmm, what is the > plural for thesis, in english?. In Spanish it is the same word, changing > the prefix article: "la tesis"/"las tesis" :). "theses" - isn't English fun? __

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-01 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/10 16:09, Georg Brandl wrote: > In conclusion, I hope to have everything set up during October, and > begin a test phase that takes as long as we feel is necessary to get > acquainted with the new repos and infrastructure before making the > r

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-01 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 01.08.2010 15:49, schrieb Jesus Cea: > How is migration to Mercurial going?. Showstoppers?. Dirkjan is busy with his thesis for another two months. Since he's the mastermind, nothing much will go forward unless someone else seeks to take over his position. I am also busy with my thesis for th

Re: [python-committers] Mercurial Status?

2010-08-01 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 15:49, Jesus Cea wrote: > How is migration to Mercurial going?. Showstoppers?. I've been gone for a week and am just now catching up, but a lot of progress has been made on hgsubversion fixes. I have a problem on the box where I run the conversion though, and I'm trying to