On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:44:55PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I will admit that I think we lost some core devs who had zero exposure to
> GitHub prior to switching and never found the motivation to ramp up on the
> new workflow.
*raises hand*
I'm one of them. Not that I was a prolific core dev
2018-06-03 3:07 GMT+02:00 Guido van Rossum :
> The best course of action seems to be to take measures to acquire new
> committers (and contributors), not to try and reactivate old inactive
> committers.
My advice is to spend more time on mentoring and less time to write
code yourself. In my experi
[Victor Stinner ]
> ...
> In short, the feature commit + fix the commit became a single commit :-)
>
I'd give a lot of weight to that - if I cared about counting commits at
all, which I don't ;-)
I just recently learned enough about git and github to get my feet wet
again. My first patch was to
2018-06-03 10:27 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> That said, it is true that core development activity continues to
> shrink, at least according to this particular metric:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/graphs/contributors
I also noticed a very significant drop in the number of commits in the
mas
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 18:08 Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Sounds to me like these are probably just past committers who are no
> longer active for whatever personal reasons, and took no action when we
> moved to GitHub. We basically never remove the commit bit from anyone
> except by request, and I o
Le 03/06/2018 à 12:36, Berker Peksağ a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> That said, it is true that core development activity continues to
>> shrink, at least according to this particular metric:
>> https://github.com/python/cpython/graphs/contributors
>
> I thi
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> That said, it is true that core development activity continues to
> shrink, at least according to this particular metric:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/graphs/contributors
I think the pre-GitHub stats includes merge commits too:
That's not the symptom of a « 50% reduction in activity ». 10 years
ago, it was already the case that many core developers were inactive
(not necessarily the same as today!).
That said, it is true that core development activity continues to
shrink, at least according to this particular metric:
h
On 3 June 2018 at 11:07, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Sounds to me like these are probably just past committers who are no
> longer active for whatever personal reasons, and took no action when we
> moved to GitHub. We basically never remove the commit bit from anyone
> except by request, and I only
Sounds to me like these are probably just past committers who are no longer
active for whatever personal reasons, and took no action when we moved to
GitHub. We basically never remove the commit bit from anyone except by
request, and I only recall seeing one such request, ever. Some of them
probabl
Is that a 50% reduction or is that just 50% of the people who could be active
are?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/2018 12:46 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
>>
>> And perhaps this is to be discussed in a separate thread: even though in the
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
