Am 02.02.2011 19:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> Le mercredi 02 février 2011 à 19:39 +0100, Jesus Cea a écrit :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/02/11 19:28, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> >> The merge here is mostly automatic. In fact, if the RM doesn't change
>> >> his/her
Am 03.02.2011 01:37, schrieb Jesus Cea:
> On 02/02/11 21:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> Just exactly the reverse of current workflow.
>
>> And for good reason (IMO). It's often much less clear exactly how far back a
>> specific patch should be committed when it's first being developed. It makes
>>
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> In fact, "up-porting" is usually better, because you don't have to think
> if you must downport or not. Versión "n+1" is always a superset of
> versión "n". So you "up-port" *ALWAYS*, automatically (mostly) via merge.
As I said, I'm happy to rol
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 22:04 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> > In fact, "up-porting" is usually better, because you don't have to think
> > if you must downport or not. Versión "n+1" is always a superset of
> > versión "n". So you "up-port" *
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 22:04 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
>> > In fact, "up-porting" is usually better, because you don't have to think
>> > if you must downport or not. Versión "n+1
On Feb 03, 2011, at 09:01 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>I don't think branching off at beta1 is helpful. Developers will happily
>continue adding features to trunk (because that's what's fun, isn't it),
>and not care much about the release branch. Obviously we want the opposite,
>and we want them to
On Feb 03, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>Exactly. This is why I didn't do it that way it during the 3.2 releases; I
>was always waiting for the hg switch to happen, and until then I thought it
>best not to change the process.
Smart man. :)
We have a perfect storm approaching for the m
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 09:01 +0100, Georg Brandl a écrit :
> I don't think branching off at beta1 is helpful. Developers will happily
> continue adding features to trunk (because that's what's fun, isn't it),
> and not care much about the release branch. Obviously we want the opposite,
> and
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 16:36 -0500, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> On Feb 03, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> >Exactly. This is why I didn't do it that way it during the 3.2 releases; I
> >was always waiting for the hg switch to happen, and until then I thought it
> >best not to change t
Am 03.02.2011 22:39, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 09:01 +0100, Georg Brandl a écrit :
>> I don't think branching off at beta1 is helpful. Developers will happily
>> continue adding features to trunk (because that's what's fun, isn't it),
>> and not care much about the relea
Am 03.02.2011 22:36, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> On Feb 03, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>>Exactly. This is why I didn't do it that way it during the 3.2 releases; I
>>was always waiting for the hg switch to happen, and until then I thought it
>>best not to change the process.
>
> Smart
On Feb 03, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>I'm not sure all of us will be *physically* in Atlanta - although
>there's no doubt we'll think about you :)
I guess that means you won't be there? Bummer!
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Feb 03, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>I'm still hoping to get the conversion done *before* PyCon, so that everyone
>can already get familiar with the new system, in order to be productive at the
>sprints. But of course, I'm also counting on PyCon sprints as the "last line
>of defence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/11 13:04, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
>> In fact, "up-porting" is usually better, because you don't have to think
>> if you must downport or not. Versión "n+1" is always a superset of
>> versión "n"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/11 15:07, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> One useful thing I have personally gotten out of this discussion is to
> identify the core reason I feel backporting is the "right" way to
> handle maintenance branches: it ensures that the *tests* that confirm
15 matches
Mail list logo
