On Feb 18, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>It says they are "highly discouraged" because "absolute imports are
>more portable and usually more readable", but now that people have had
>a chance to use explicit relative imports, do people still believe
>this? I mean if we truly believed this
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 15:13, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> >It says they are "highly discouraged" because "absolute imports are
> >more portable and usually more readable", but now that people have had
> >a chance to use explicit relative imports, d
Not sure if Martin is the only person who can fix this, but it would be nice
to have those URLs working.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On Feb 23, 2011, at 03:32 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>What kind of example are you setting as the FLUFL if you won't even file a
>bug report?!? Don't make me hold your __future__ statement ransom!
If I filed a bug report every time I actually found a bug, I'd never be able
to read email! Wait, hmmm
Am 24.02.2011 02:39, schrieb Brett Cannon:
> Not sure if Martin is the only person who can fix this, but it would be
> nice to have those URLs working.
I have added a redirect for 3.2.x. I haven't added one for 3.2.0, since
we currently don't have any redirects for X.Y.0, only for X.Y.
Regards,
M
