Hello,
I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests. But it seems that
there are developers who see it otherwise.
For example, Raymond's cha
Le samedi 22 juin 2013 à 12:02 -0700, Eli Bendersky a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're
> supposed to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the
> impression that it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests.
> But it seem
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
>to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
>it's only bug fixes, documentation, and maybe tests. But it seems that
>there are developers w
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:35:41 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
> >I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
> >to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
> >it's only bug fixes, docume
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
> >I may be missing something, but do we have a policy of what we're supposed
> >to commit to the 2.7 branch at this point? I was under the impression that
> >it's only bug fixes, document
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> [1] Well, maybe penultimate, but I wouldn't mind seeing the Mercurial
> equivalent of a wrastlin' match between him and the BDFL. :)
You wouldn't see that this summer though -- I could just tackle him in
the office. :-)
--
--Guido van Ross
Maybe time it so when we *would* have released a 2.8 (18 months or so after
2.7) is when it goes into critical/security fixes only?
On Jun 22, 2013 11:50 PM, "Eli Bendersky" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrot
2013/6/22 Eli Bendersky :
> Yes, this makes sense too.
>
> In general there seems to be an agreement, so it would be great to document
> in some place. Many years will pass before we have another "special" release
> like Python 2.7, so it's worth spending an extra few minutes to have this
> written
On 23 June 2013 12:56, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/6/22 Eli Bendersky :
>> Yes, this makes sense too.
>>
>> In general there seems to be an agreement, so it would be great to document
>> in some place. Many years will pass before we have another "special" release
>> like Python 2.7, so it's wo
