On 26.06.2013 04:10, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>
> Everything I read in this thread says that 2.7 only gets bug fixes, and even
> at that it has to be a
> pretty bad bug. (Benjamin: "If it's been broken for all of the 2.x series,
> it probably doesn't need
> to be fixed now.") I don't see even
2013/6/25 Larry Hastings :
> I'm not questioning the decision--I'm asking, what is the heuristic I can
> apply in the future to predict whether or not a change will be accepted into
> the 2.7 branch. My current heuristic ("only bad bug fixes") seems to be on
> the fritz.
I realize everyone wants
