On 2 April 2017 at 06:59, Nick Coghlan wrote:
[...]
> And from the point of view of the impact on folks suspended and/or
> banned, "I got suspended/banned from due to my inability to
> follow explicit directions regarding my communications style" doesn't
> seem to me all that different from "I go
Here's a step-by-step guide of how things would be handled with Raymond's
proposal -- which seems reasonable to me, BTW -- and can act as an initial
draft of what we can put in the devguide:
1. A person is warned that they are violating the CoC by the moderator
of the resource being used and
Thanks, Raymond, this reads like a good proposal, but I'd like to
suggest that the three people in question are only intended to
discuss whether a CoC event has taken place or not and what the
person has to say about this.
They should then write up a summary to present to the PSF Board
which then
On 3 April 2017 at 04:08, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 at 04:34 Paul Moore wrote:
>> As a result, the public perception of a "code of conduct violation" is
>> that someone has harassed, or otherwise made a community member
>> uncomfortable, specifically because they don't conform to t
