Trent Nelson schrieb:
> And last but not least, thanks to Guido and all the Python committers
> for their tireless efforts to date. Although the sheer elegance of
> the language is what initially attracted me to Python, it was the
> developer community that made me want to stick
Trent Nelson wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed so far. Titus, Bill, Adam,
> Kelly, George: Snakebite wouldn't be anything more than a twinkle
> in my eye if it weren't for the support MSU has thrown behind the
> project, thank you for all your efforts to date. Hank,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Trent Nelson
wrote:
... snip
>Snakebite is my gift to you!
>
>
>Trent.
Wow, thank you Trent - this really rocks.
-jesse
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
On Jan 26, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
Snakebite is my gift to you!
Wow, this will be an amazing resource. Congratulations on pulling all
of this together, and thanks. Can I mention this to the other Jython
committers or would you prefer I wait on that?
-Frank
__
[SNIP - Trent finally gets to announce Snakebite publicly]
Thanks for spear-heading this, Trent, and to everyone who helped along
the way! This is an amazing project. It makes me actually want to try
to fix a bug just to give it a go. This is definitely going to help
keep Python ahead of the pack
Trent,
Congrats on the current state of the project, you went quite a ways in a very
short amount of time.
And I am glad we were able to assist you.
Thanks,
Hank Janssen
Principal Group Program Manager/Director
Microsoft Open Source Technology Center
Desk: 425-706-2305
hjans...@microsoft.co
Catchy subject eh? Unless, of course, you've seen Forgetting Sarah
Marshall, in which case, it's probably a tad disturbing.
Nevertheless, I do have a surprise for everyone. I spent a lot of
time early last year trying to keep the buildbots green, especially
the x64 Windows on
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> >>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> >>> a version of sphinx that is included in
Matthias Klose schrieb:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
>> have a specific fix in mind?
>
>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> a version of
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
a version of sphinx that is included in the d
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>>> specific revision that you would like to
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
> have a specific fix in mind?
the specific change was committed
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
>> a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
>> specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
>> h
I'm not sure I understand your request. Is it okay to build docs using
a version of sphinx that is included in the distro? Is there a
specific revision that you would like to see rolled back, or do you
have a specific fix in mind? I suspect few people here understand the
(apparently largely politic
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Arguing
>> with him is like getting involved with quicksand, so let's just all
>> ignore him, and it will tide over.
>
> While that's no doubt very good advice, I still couldn't resist
> commenting on the (to me) bizarre notion that supporting a non
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Arguing
> with him is like getting involved with quicksand, so let's just all
> ignore him, and it will tide over.
While that's no doubt very good advice, I still couldn't resist
commenting on the (to me) bizarre notion that supporting a non-free
platform with free tools
18 matches
Mail list logo
