On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:21 PM Raymond Hettinger <
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My two cents: I think this should be a little more liberal. At beta 1,
> freeze the addition of new features but continue to tweak the
> implementation with code clean-ups, additional tests, algorithmic
>
It’s true that as releases get closer to final, more people will start
exercising them. However, you really don’t have to wait. I maintain
“official” Linux (Ubuntu) Docker images that contain all the latest releases
(including alphas and betas), and the git head of the development branch at
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:21 PM Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> If not, perhaps we should just have a single beta, frozen except for bugfixes.
+1 for having betas frozen, except for bug fixes. But the bug fixes
need to go somewhere, so I propose to have yet another frozen beta (if
there are bug
Le mar. 7 juil. 2020 à 04:21, Raymond Hettinger
a écrit :
> At beta 1, freeze the addition of new features but continue to tweak the
> implementation with code clean-ups, (...)
IMHO clean-ups should stop after beta1. Only the master branch should
receive cleanup changes. A clean-up doesn't
