On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening the
requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
http header
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
http header injection. The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
specific
On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
specific exemptions from the backwards compatibility requirements for
security fixes -- because their
On 29/07/15 18:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more by Googling for keywords like
http header injection. The more recent
For reference, a similar bug fix also introduced incompatibilities with the
Chishop service: http://bugs.python.org/issue23899
On Jul 29, 2015, at 12:06, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.esmailto:j...@jcea.es wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded one of my computer to 2.7.10 and a program working
for years failed.
On 30 July 2015 at 05:20, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015 11:08 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
The more recent Python 2.7 bugfix releases have
specific exemptions from the
On 7/29/2015 1:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening the
requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more
When in doubt, such discussions should be escalated to python-dev. I don't
know if this one was, though I vaguely recall seeing it discussed
somewhere. Anyway, since it's been released, it should stay in.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 30
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:41:09 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 7/29/2015 1:01 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 04:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
the
requirements for headers)
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:11:53 +0200, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
On 29/07/15 18:50, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I believe that in this particular case, the bug was fixed (by tightening
the requirements for headers) because the bug can lead to security
vulnerabilities. I think you can find more
10 matches
Mail list logo
