Sorry to bring up this old topic.
I'm trying to decide how to handle discussions for PEP 581, and I'm open to
try out new things :)
Are we all still content with posting to python-dev?
I was thinking in addition to a thread in python-dev, I want to allow
discussions to take place in zulip, under a
On 07/11/2018 09:25 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
Sorry to bring up this old topic.
I'm trying to decide how to handle discussions for PEP 581, and I'm open to try
out new things :)
Are we all still content with posting to python-dev?
I was thinking in addition to a thread in python-dev, I want t
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 10:31 Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 09:25 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
>
> > Sorry to bring up this old topic.
> >
> > I'm trying to decide how to handle discussions for PEP 581, and I'm open
> to try out new things :)
> > Are we all still content with posting to python
I like the Zulip idea, though it'll be hard to get permalinks to past
discussions.
Also, before going to python-dev it should probably be battle-tested in
python-ideas (PEP 572 wasn't ready for python-dev when it was moved there,
and I'm still recovering from the resulting brawl).
On Wed, Jul 11,
For permalink in zulip, the link from "Copy link to conversation" seems to
be sufficient.
I've created a stream (
https://python.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/130206-.23pep581/subject/hello/near/129486993)
but it now has double ## 😅 and it seems I can't rename it to remove the
extra "#"
I've been w
I just renamed the stream so there's now just a single #. :)
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 11:22 Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
>
> For permalink in zulip, the link from "Copy link to conversation" seems to
> be sufficient.
> I've created a stream (
> https://python.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/130206-.23pep58
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
>
> For permalink in zulip, the link from "Copy link to conversation" seems to
> be sufficient.
> I've created a stream (https://python.zulipchat.com/
> #narrow/stream/130206-.23pep581/subject/hello/near/129486993) but it now
> has double #