Thank you ;-) Welcome to a new world where only 2 backports are needed for
bug fixes ;-)
Victor
Le 11 août 2017 23:49, "Brett Cannon" a écrit :
> I just deleted the "backport to 3.5" label. I checked that no PRs only had
> that label before doing so (they all at least had a "backport to 3.6"
>
I just deleted the "backport to 3.5" label. I checked that no PRs only had
that label before doing so (they all at least had a "backport to 3.6"
label).
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 at 14:05 Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> Just catching up with emails.
> +1 to removing the label.
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2017 12:04 PM,
Just catching up with emails.
+1 to removing the label.
On Aug 11, 2017 12:04 PM, "Brett Cannon" wrote:
> No one has said anything, so I will delete the label sometime today.
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 12:20 Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 01:55 Victor Stinner
>> wrote:
>>
>>> H
No one has said anything, so I will delete the label sometime today.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 12:20 Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 01:55 Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Python 3.5 entered security fix only mode. Should we now remove the
>> "needs backport to 3.5" label? Other s
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 01:55 Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Python 3.5 entered security fix only mode. Should we now remove the
> "needs backport to 3.5" label? Other security only branches don't have
> this label neither (3.3 and 3.4).
>
Seems reasonable to me since you will need to get Larry's
