[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-79?page=all ]
Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-79:
-
Resolution: Fixed
> util.FieldStorage doesn't correctly check the mime types of POSTed entities
> -
util.FieldStorage doesn't correctly check the mime types of POSTed entities
---
Key: MODPYTHON-79
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-79
Project: mod_python
Type: Bug
Versions
Er, just as a notice, the second test for "multipart/" was already
correct, but I've changed it to 'not ctypes.startswith("multipart/")'
for better code consistency.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/9/8, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Dominic,
>
> That's perfectly acceptable. I've just used the s
Hi Dominic,
That's perfectly acceptable. I've just used the startswith method of
the str class instead of the lambda function you used. I've checked in
the fix, hopefully it will appear in the next beta release.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/9/8, Dominic Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This was rep
Hi,
This was reported in 2003, and as far as I can tell the behaviour is
still present in util.py:
The full format of the media-type element according to RFC2616 is:
media-type = type "/" subtype *( ";" parameter )
type = token
subtype = token
There are many user agents out there
Anybody got FreeBSD? I'm getting this. This is an old and possibly
misconfigured system, so the problem could be on my end.
FreeBSD 4.9
apache 2.0.53 (from ports)
python 2.3.3
$ make
Compiling for DSO.
/usr/local/sbin/apxs -I/home/grisha/src/tmp/mod_python-3.2.1b/src/include
-I/usr/local/i
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Ron Reisor wrote:
Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an
early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession.
Even better, you can use Session.Session() and the "PythonOption session
FileSession" configu
Ron Reisor wrote:
Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an
early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession.
Even better, you can use Session.Session() and the "PythonOption session
FileSession" configuration directive to get all the benefits of
Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an
early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession. Looks
good. Gotta love it!
thanks,
Ron
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Wow, that's a nice one :).
2005/9/7, Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the
agenda for a later release (why not 3.3 ?).
For the moment I don't see any quick and easy way to support both 2.0
and 2.1, from what you wrote. I'd rather we try to get 3.2 out with a
proper 2.0 support,
+1
Linux Debian Sid
apache 2.0.54
python 2.3.5
GCC 4.0.2
I agree with Nicolas. If we start chasing apache 2.1 alpha support we
might *never* get 3.2 out the door. :-( Also, what's the roadmap for
apache 2.1/2.2?
Jim
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the
agenda for a later release (why not 3.3
Wow, that's a nice one :).
2005/9/7, Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> MacOSX 10.4.2
> gcc-4.0.0 (Apple build)
> Python 2.4.1
> Apache 2.0.54
>
> cheers,
>
> Ron
>
>
> Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3)
> University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
>
+1
MacOSX 10.4.2
gcc-4.0.0 (Apple build)
Python 2.4.1
Apache 2.0.54
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D
No support for Apache 2.1 yet
-
Key: MODPYTHON-78
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78
Project: mod_python
Type: Bug
Versions: 3.2.0
Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
Fix For: 3.3.0
See http://article.gmane.org/
Hi,
Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the
agenda for a later release (why not 3.3 ?).
For the moment I don't see any quick and easy way to support both 2.0
and 2.1, from what you wrote. I'd rather we try to get 3.2 out with a
proper 2.0 support, and try to fix things f
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jorey Bump wrote:
-1
Slackware Linux 10.1
Python 2.4.1
Apache 2.1.6 Alpha
I don't think we mean to support 2.1.6 alpha, so this doesn't count. :-)
Grisha
A new mod_python 3.2 beta tarball is now available for testing. A
Windows binary for python 2.4 is also provided.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
should feel obligated
18 matches
Mail list logo
