[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-93) Improve util.FieldStorage efficiency

2006-03-19 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-93?page=comments#action_12370996 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-93: I was checking the documentation with respect to this patch and I noticed a couple of things. The FieldStorage constructor

Re: New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 Commit it. The point of the snapshot is encourage testing to catch problems earlier in the development cylce. Jim Graham Dumpleton wrote: On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I find I work more effectively when I have deadlines to worry about (being a procrastinator by natu

Re: New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
If the new importer isn't on by default, I don't see any reason why you should not commit it to subversion, quite the contrary. Therefore I'm +1 on the subject. Regards, Nicolas 2006/3/19, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: > > > I find I w

New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I find I work more effectively when I have deadlines to worry about (being a procrastinator by nature), so I thought I'd propose the following roadmap. Mar 20: 3.3-dev - snapshot for testing Apr 1: 3.2.9 - bugfix release May 1: 3.3-dev

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-143) Implement and integrate a new module importer.

2006-03-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-143?page=comments#action_12370976 ] Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-143: For technical reasons related to ensuring new importer got to take over from old at the right time, original plan