Re: Confirmation on whether MODPYTHON-168 is fixed.
Graham Dumpleton wrote: > Jim > > Can you confirm that: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-168 > > has actually been fixed in 3.3 and we can mark this as fixed in that > version. > > Looks like it is fixed to me. Yes, and I just mark it as such. Jim
Confirmation on whether MODPYTHON-168 is fixed.
Jim Can you confirm that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-168 has actually been fixed in 3.3 and we can mark this as fixed in that version. Looks like it is fixed to me. Graham