Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> Note that the problem with Apache 2.2 on Windows XP SP2 seems to have
> disappeared, though I can't see how this is possible, unless Graham fixed
> something :).
>
> The problem was more probably due to an Apache 2.2 setup glitch.
Not necessarily a glitch. The whole prob
Note that the problem with Apache 2.2 on Windows XP SP2 seems to have disappeared, though I can't see how this is possible, unless Graham fixed something :).The problem was more probably due to an Apache 2.2 setup glitch.
Regards,Nicolas2006/7/31, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We decided to fi
We decided to fix the memory leak in parse_qsl and move on to 3.2.10,
which has been tested and currently has +3 core votes. All we need now
is the official release. One of these days I'll sort out my GPG keys so
I can sign these things myself but in the mean time we'll need your
help, Grisha.
Mai
Sorry for the late response - I was trying to have a "vacation" - that's
when you are geographically in a different place with slow internet access
and read only "some" of your e-mail ;-)
+1 for core vote (with the note about the 2.2.2 XP SP2 issue).
Grisha
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Graham Du
