On 3/4/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, if want to get that pedantic and formalised, it does look
like one can select
an alternate workflow. The level of administration access we have
probably does
not allow us to change it, let alone see what options exist.
Come up
On 04/03/2006, at 4:59 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
More in the way of a general observation rather than on these
specific issues, but I wouldn't necessarily mark things as resolved
just on the basis of the fix being committed. For the big changes
at least, I think we should see some
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 04/03/2006, at 4:59 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
More in the way of a general observation rather than on these
specific issues, but I wouldn't necessarily mark things as resolved
just on the basis of the fix being committed. For the big changes at
least, I think
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
One of the problems when I am looking at making changes to mod_python
is knowing that there is some consensus that changes are a good thing, or
at least that there is no objection.
I feel the same way. Let's establish some policy. I'll start a separate
thread for that
One of the problems when I am looking at making changes to mod_python
is knowing that there is some consensus that changes are a good
thing, or
at least that there is no objection.
So far if a change was trivial, I would commit it without
consultation. I have
also committed some changes
