On 4/22/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately it tends to be just you and I tossing ideas back and forth
> and when you have a two person democracy at work, hard to get some
> consensus of what is the best direction to go. :-(
I think the namespace direction you're taking
On 23/04/2006, at 6:29 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
We are slowly acquiring a number of "reserved" PythonOption
keywords which should likely be collected in one place so we don't
end up with any name collisions. Does the PythonOption page in
section 5.4.10 seem most appropriate? eg.
http://w
