On 2/9/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I recollect, the only real issue was the implications on Win32 platform
> of changing the APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) test to (s == APR_SUCCESS),
> because of Win32 the definition was originally:
>
> #define APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) ((s) == A
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > The next section of code has:
> >
> > b = APR_BRIGADE_FIRST(self->bb_in);
> >
> > if (b == APR_BRIGADE_SENTINEL(self->bb_in))
> > return PyString_FromString("");
> >
> > Now I am assuming here that the check with APR_BRIGADE_SE
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
I'd like to checkin my patch to support apache 2.2. It doesn't add any
new functionality. Any objections?
If I recollect, the only real issue was the implications on Win32 platform
of changing the APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) test to (s == APR_SUCCE
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> I'd like to checkin my patch to support apache 2.2. It doesn't add any
> new functionality. Any objections?
If I recollect, the only real issue was the implications on Win32 platform
of changing the APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS(s) test to (s == APR_SUCCESS),
because of Win32 the
