Indeed :)
2006/2/22, Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I know you're going ahead with 3.2.8 already, but I thought this would be
> interesting:
>
> +1 Mac OS X 10.4.5 Intel Core Duo, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.4.2
>
> cheers,
>
> Ron
>
>
> Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3)
> Universit
I know you're going ahead with 3.2.8 already, but I thought this would be
interesting:
+1 Mac OS X 10.4.5 Intel Core Duo, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.4.2
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Com
Oh crap.
I changed the License information in htdocs/tests.py and thought, "Gee
this is a simple change. No need to run the unit tests before I commit
the changes". Wrong. As it happens one of the unit tests looks at the
first line of htdocs/tests.py, which of course is now different. I've
fi
Yup. Much better with that one:
##
Ran 6 tests in 91.047s
OK
##
You have my +1 (even though you weren't waiting for it)
And my merged util.py also passes the test suite, which is what I really
wanted to know.
--
Mike Looijmans
Philips Natlab / Topic Automation
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Yup,
Yup, the SVN trunk currently contains tests that fail on 3.2.8 (Graham
added some features and their unit test in the trunk), but you can
test the 3.2.8 release against the 3.2.8 test suite (available from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_python/tags/release-3-2-8 )
and you won't see any
I get failing tests on WinXP-sp2, apache 2.0.54, python 2.4.2.
This may be because the test suite is looking for things not there yet.
Put the 3.2.8 binary distribution on my system and did a svn update to
get the latest test suite. When running the tests, I got the following
failures (can we
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 21/02/2006, at 7:08 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
The Apache 2.2 support will likely go into the 3.2.9 bugfix release.
We just wanted to get the security problem out of the way first.
Jim, if we are again going to aim for a bug rollup release for 3.2.9 do I
need to st
On 21/02/2006, at 7:08 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
The Apache 2.2 support will likely go into the 3.2.9 bugfix release.
We just wanted to get the security problem out of the way first.
Jim, if we are again going to aim for a bug rollup release for 3.2.9
do I
need to stop or hold off on doing a
+1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
Hi Oden,
The Apache 2.2 support will likely go into the 3.2.9 bugfix release. We
just wanted to get the security problem out of the way first.
Jim
Oden Eriksson wrote:
+1 Mandriva Linux Cooker (x86_64), apache 2.2.0 mpm-prefork, python-2.4.2
Note that I applied this change:
http://issues.a
Oops, I've sent this mail a bit too fast...
As usual, all three binary versions are available here :
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/2/20, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 mod_python 3.2.8 + Apache/2.0.55 + Python/2.2.3 + Windows 2000 SP4
> +1 mod_py
+1 mod_python 3.2.8 + Apache/2.0.55 + Python/2.2.3 + Windows 2000 SP4
+1 mod_python 3.2.8 + Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.3.5 + Windows 2000 SP4
+1 mod_python 3.2.8 + Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.4.2 + Windows XP SP2
+1 FreeBSD 6.0, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.4.2
+1 Debian sid, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.3.5
14 matches
Mail list logo
