Re: Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)

2006-07-31 Thread Graham Dumpleton
g the fact that we drop the support for those two > > >>> functions. If we accept this, then it's a +1. > > >> > > >> The issue with server cleanups failing and why is covered by: > > >> > > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPY

Re: Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)

2006-07-31 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
t;> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:>>>>>>>> I'm barely keeping my head above water right now with work, so not>>>> really following the list - if someone could please ping me when/if you >>>> think we're ready for the core group vote and

Re: Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)

2006-07-31 Thread Jim Gallacher
a core vote. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm barely keeping my head above water right now with work, so not >>>> really following the list - if someone could please ping me when/if you >&

Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)

2006-07-30 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: python-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 Jim Gallacher wrote: The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing. This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3,

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-07-01 Thread Graham Dumpleton
+1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5 +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5 On 30/06/2006, at 12:52 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing. This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-07-01 Thread Jorey Bump
+1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 Jim Gallacher wrote: The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing. This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and packagin

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-06-30 Thread Colin Bean
+1 Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-06-30 Thread Ron Reisor
+1 MacOSX 10.4.7 Intel, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/prefork), Python-2.4.2 cheers, Ron Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3) University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716 pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-06-30 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
I've got :+1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3But, and it's my fault for not having tested this for a long time :-1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3 Only two tests fail but with a segfault, it's test_srv_register_cleanup and test_apache_register_cleanup.

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-06-29 Thread
+1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 On 6/29/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 Jim Gallacher wrote: > The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing. > > This tarball is un

Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing

2006-06-29 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 Jim Gallacher wrote: > The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing. > > This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway > - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and > packa