Re: mod_python license

2006-02-26 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: On 20/02/2006, at 4:22 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I just notice that a few files still say that mod_python uses Apache License 1.1 (eg htdocs/tests.py, src/psp_string.c). Can I assume this is an error and that *everything* should be version 2.0? Jim, I think you man

Re: mod_python license

2006-02-25 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 20/02/2006, at 4:22 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I just notice that a few files still say that mod_python uses Apache License 1.1 (eg htdocs/tests.py, src/psp_string.c). Can I assume this is an error and that *everything* should be version 2.0? Jim, I think you managed to delete the Copyrig

Re: mod_python license

2006-02-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 2/21/06, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Technically speaking, if you make a change to the file, you should be > ensuring you add the current years date. Ie., not replace it. Thus, > presuming no changes were made in 2005, you would have: > > * Copyright 2004, 2006 Apache Softwar

Re: mod_python license

2006-02-21 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On 2/19/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I just notice that a few files still say that mod_python uses Apache > >>License 1.1 (eg htdocs/tests.py, src/psp_string.c). Can I assume this > is > >>an error and that *everything*

Re: mod_python license

2006-02-21 Thread Jim Gallacher
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 2/19/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just notice that a few files still say that mod_python uses Apache License 1.1 (eg htdocs/tests.py, src/psp_string.c). Can I assume this is an error and that *everything* should be version 2.0? Yes. -- justin

mod_python license

2006-02-19 Thread Jim Gallacher
I just notice that a few files still say that mod_python uses Apache License 1.1 (eg htdocs/tests.py, src/psp_string.c). Can I assume this is an error and that *everything* should be version 2.0? Jim