Re: New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 Commit it. The point of the snapshot is encourage testing to catch problems earlier in the development cylce. Jim Graham Dumpleton wrote: On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I find I work more effectively when I have deadlines to worry about (being a procrastinator by natu

Re: New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
If the new importer isn't on by default, I don't see any reason why you should not commit it to subversion, quite the contrary. Therefore I'm +1 on the subject. Regards, Nicolas 2006/3/19, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: > > > I find I w

New module importer. Was: Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 14/03/2006, at 12:23 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I find I work more effectively when I have deadlines to worry about (being a procrastinator by nature), so I thought I'd propose the following roadmap. Mar 20: 3.3-dev - snapshot for testing Apr 1: 3.2.9 - bugfix release May 1: 3.3-dev

Re: mod_python roadmap

2006-03-14 Thread Mike Looijmans
... Any other issues for a 3.2.9 release? (This is where Mike L. should advocate for MODPYTHON-93 - Improved FieldStorage. ;) ) Eh, yeah, I have a suggestion: MODPYTHON-93 - Improved FieldStorage - Stop putting simple key/value pairs into StringIO objects, put them simple str objects - Use a

mod_python roadmap

2006-03-13 Thread Jim Gallacher
I find I work more effectively when I have deadlines to worry about (being a procrastinator by nature), so I thought I'd propose the following roadmap. Mar 20: 3.3-dev - snapshot for testing Apr 1: 3.2.9 - bugfix release May 1: 3.3-dev - snapshot for testing Jun 15: 3.3-dev - snapsh