Re: 3.2

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
MODPYTHON-34 has been fixed in the current version of the publisher, with the new importing system. As I've written before, I can roll back the part regarding the import system if you really want that, all the while maintaining the fix for MODPYTHON-34. Regards, Nicolas2005/7/29, Graham Dumpleton

Re: 3.2

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
As for MODPYTHON-67, I've just reviewed your patch, +1ed it and checked it in. The only problem I could imagine about it is that there is no downward compatibility (code for 3.2.x would not run on 3.1.x), but I think this is not a big problem. Regards, Nicolas2005/7/29, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PR

Re: 3.2

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Hi Jim, Do you want me to mark the issues resolved ? Don't you have the rights to do this ? If you don't have the right, then maybe Scott Sanders can give them to you (and to Graham while we're at it...). Scott, are you reading this ? Regards, Nicolas2005/7/29, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-58) _apache._global_lock results in segfault when index > number of mutexes

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-58?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-58: - Fix Version: 3.2.0 Resolution: Fixed > _apache._global_lock results in segfault when index > number of mutexes > -

Few issues with new mod_python.publisher.

2005-08-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Have started to have a look through the latest mod_python.publisher code, got a few comments to make about it. First is that it has been changed to allow "HEAD" requests whereas before it only supported "GET" and "POST". A "HEAD" request is handled by the mod_python.publisher code saying:

[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-62) local_ip and local_host in connection object returns remote_ip and remote_host instead

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-62?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-62: - Fix Version: 3.2.0 Resolution: Duplicate This has already been fixed. > local_ip and local_host in connection object returns remote_ip an

[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-66) install_dso target also tries to install Python code files.

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-66?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-66: - Fix Version: 3.2.0 Resolution: Fixed > install_dso target also tries to install Python code files. > -

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-59) Add get_session() method to request object

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-59?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-59: Fix Version: 3.3.0 Version: 3.1.4 3.1.3 3.2.0 (was: 3.3.0) > Add get_session() method t

[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-65) 3.2 working version will not install on Mac OS X (10.3.7)

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-65?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-65: - Fix Version: 3.2.0 Resolution: Fixed > 3.2 working version will not install on Mac OS X (10.3.7) > ---

Re: 3.2

2005-08-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton
A prerequisite for full JIRA access is probably going to be sending in the ASF committers agreement. I haven't done that as yet and so don't have SVN access either. I am hoping that my work load will drop after I take a holiday in September and I'll be able to finally start taking a more dir

Re: Few issues with new mod_python.publisher.

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:08:08PM +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: Okay. What though are the implications of content still being returned for a HEAD request. What does the standard say about that? RFC 2616, 9.4 HEAD The HEAD method is identical to GET except that th

[jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-71) Support the HEAD method properly

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
Support the HEAD method properly Key: MODPYTHON-71 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-71 Project: mod_python Type: Bug Versions: 3.1.4, 3.1.3, 2.7.10, 3.2.0 Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen Priority: Minor R

[jira] Assigned: (MODPYTHON-72) mod_python.publisher no longer pays attention to result of req.get_addhandler_exts()

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-72?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen reassigned MODPYTHON-72: --- Assign To: Nicolas Lehuen > mod_python.publisher no longer pays attention to result of > req.get_addhandler_exts() > --

[jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-72) mod_python.publisher no longer pays attention to result of req.get_addhandler_exts()

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
mod_python.publisher no longer pays attention to result of req.get_addhandler_exts() Key: MODPYTHON-72 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-72 Project: mod_python Typ

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-34) mod_python.publisher index.py exposes underscore prefixed variables

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-34?page=all ] Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-34: Fix Version: 3.2.0 Description: If index.py is used with mod_python.publisher, all underscore prefixed variables are actually visible and not hidd

mod_python package maintainers - are you out there?

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Another remark : has anyone suscribed to redhat, debian etc. mailing list to watch for such patches ? Not me. I don't understand why those guys aren't posting their patches on the mod_python mailing list. I was wondering the same thing. What would be better for us, su

Re: [jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-71) Support the HEAD method properly

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA) wrote: Support the HEAD method properly Key: MODPYTHON-71 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-71 Project: mod_python Type: Bug Versions: 3.1.4, 3.1.3, 2.7.10, 3.2.0 Reporter: Nicolas

Re: mod_python package maintainers - are you out there?

2005-08-10 Thread Juha-Matti Tapio
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:04:04AM -0400, Jim Gallacher wrote: > Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > >I don't understand why those guys > >aren't posting their patches on the mod_python mailing list. > I was wondering the same thing. What would be better for us, subscribing > to a bunch of mailing lists or c

Re: 3.2 (import and publisher issues)

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: MODPYTHON-34 has been fixed in the current version of the publisher, with the new importing system. As I've written before, I can roll back the part regarding the import system if you really want that, all the while maintaining the fix for MODPYTHON-34. I haven't had muc

Re: Few issues with new mod_python.publisher.

2005-08-10 Thread Jorey Bump
Jim Gallacher wrote: Interestingly, section 5.1.1 says that "The methods GET and HEAD MUST be supported by all general-purpose servers.", so it would seem that mod_python has not been compliant to the RFC. FWIW, the Debian Woody package of mod_python (libapache-mod-python 2.7.8-0.0woody5) ru

Re: mod_python package maintainers - are you out there?

2005-08-10 Thread Jorey Bump
Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:04:04AM -0400, Jim Gallacher wrote: Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Having some contact with them directly is probably a good idea anyway. Subscribing to a bunch of mailing lists could result in a lot of uninteresting mail. ;) I think it would be unfa

Re: Using objects to create an explicit hierarchy.

2005-08-10 Thread Daniel Popowich
I do not have immediate comment on what you're doing, but I do have a tangential comment: Never having looked at the mod_python.util.fs_apply_data code, your email prompted me to. I noticed that the code uses "object" as a function argument name. While this works, shouldn't the argument name be

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-71) Support the HEAD method properly

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-71?page=comments#action_12318388 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-71: Apache may already be doing the right thing for us. Using netcat as the client I ran the some tests using the the following

Re: 3.2 (import and publisher issues)

2005-08-10 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
I'd like to stress the fact that a lot of issues currently in JIRA are related to the publisher. We have worked on it to solve some of these issues. I have made sure that both the old version and the new version pass a series of unit tests. I can't be sure that those unit tests reflect the whole ra

Re: 3.2 (import and publisher issues)

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: I'd like to stress the fact that a lot of issues currently in JIRA are related to the publisher. We have worked on it to solve some of these issues. I have made sure that both the old version and the new version pass a series of unit tests. I can't be sure that those unit

3.2 Compile problems with gcc 4.0

2005-08-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
I updated dated my workstation today which included pulling in gcc 4.0.1 and thought I'd give mod_python a whirl and how if they'd play together. Compilation fails with the following: requestobject.c: In function 'request_tp_dealloc': requestobject.c:1482: warning: implicit declaration of funct

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-12) ImportError: cannot import name publisher

2005-08-10 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-12?page=all ] Graham Dumpleton updated MODPYTHON-12: -- Attachment: package.diff.txt An even simpler test for this problem is to use a publisher function defined as: import mod_python def index(req):