Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-08 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Hi David, One thing I don't understand is why you have "foreign" PythonOption definitions in your test setup. Are you sure you have re-created a clean testconf.py file from testconf.py.in ? I've write a little bit of documentation in test/README, please try to follow it. It seems to me that the t

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-08 Thread David Fraser
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi David, One thing I don't understand is why you have "foreign" PythonOption definitions in your test setup. Are you sure you have re-created a clean testconf.py file from testconf.py.in ? I've write a little bit of documentation in test/README, please try to follow it.

mod_python info on modules.apache.org

2006-02-08 Thread Jim Gallacher
Hi Grisha, The mod_python information on modules.apache.org is badly out of date. It would be a good idea to update this for 3.2.7 http://modules.apache.org/search?id=220 Jim

[jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-125) Improvements associated with req.handler for type checker phase.

2006-02-08 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
Improvements associated with req.handler for type checker phase. Key: MODPYTHON-125 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-125 Project: mod_python Type: Improvement Components: core

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-125) Improvements associated with req.handler for type checker phase.

2006-02-08 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-125?page=comments#action_12365686 ] Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-125: Forgot to mention that req.content_languages is not documented in mod_python HTML documentation for request object