Re: mod_dav_python - a polite request for status

2006-06-11 Thread Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote .. > Dear Graham, > > I am the IT manager for a City of London research company, and we are > looking for a suitable icalendar server solution. Your idea (and i am > not > certain if it has become more than an idea) for bridging between mod_dav > and mod_python is intriguin

Re: 3.2.8 - Memory leaks with util.FieldStorage

2006-06-11 Thread Jim Gallacher
Laurent, Could you run a couple of more tests? test1.py from mod_python import apache, util def handler(req): pqs = util.parse_qsl('foo=a&bar=b') req.content_type = 'text/plain' req.write('mod_python.util.parse_qsl') return apache.OK test2.py from mod_python i

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-74) Add a WSGI handler to support WSGI-based frameworks

2006-06-11 Thread Damjan Georgievski (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-74?page=comments#action_12415819 ] Damjan Georgievski commented on MODPYTHON-74: - I vote for this feature to be added in mod_python. I know some of the mod_python developers don't quite like WSGI

Re: 3.2.8 - Memory leaks with util.FieldStorage

2006-06-11 Thread Laurent Blanquet
Hello, I've run the 2 tests, and I do not see any leaks. Laurent. > Laurent, > > Could you run a couple of more tests? > > test1.py > > from mod_python import apache, util > > def handler(req): > pqs = util.parse_qsl('foo=a&bar=b') > req.content_type = 'text/plain' > r