Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing

2006-12-09 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-work

Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing

2006-12-09 Thread Detmar Meurers
+1 Mac OSX (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2

Re: svn commit: r484999 - /httpd/mod_python/tags/release-3-3-0-bc1/

2006-12-09 Thread Graham Dumpleton
I don't see any harm. It isn't lost after all if one wants to go back in the revision history and get it back. :-) On 10/12/2006, at 3:04 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote: I stupidly tagged a branch with the wrong name (3-3-0-bc1 instead of 3-3-0b). Should I remove it or just let it slide? Jim [EM

Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing

2006-12-09 Thread Colin Bean
+1 Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3

Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing

2006-12-09 Thread Eric Brunson
+1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 Jim Gallacher wrote: The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing. Hopefully Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in the next couple of days. Here are the rules: In order for a file to b