Re: new mod_python faq (fwd)
I'll deal with it.
Jim
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
This was sent to me directly, anyone willing to act on it? (I don't have
the CPU cycles right now).
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:12:07 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new mod_python faq
I think may be useful to add this question:
2.30. Why do I get No space left on device: Failed to create global
mutex ?
Because mod_python has get all the available semaphores of your os.
To avoid this error on GNU/Linux do
#ipcs (to see all locked semaphores)
#for i in `ipcs | grep www-data | awk '{print $2}'`; do ipcrm -s $i;
done
www-data is the user which runs apache[12] (in Debian)
In this way you release all resources locked by apache[12]
If you want to increase the number of available semaphores append
kernel.sem = 512 32000 100 512
to your /etc/sysctl.conf
and do
#sysctl -p
--
Some of the content has benne derived from
http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017858.html
You can change anything you want of course :)
Thank you for the great work
(even if configuring mod_python in debian is painfully... )
Re: release 3.2.10?
I'm +1 on going for 3.2.10. You in Canada probably have it easier - I think we hit 96F/35C at some point today or yesterday (I wouldn't know I'm in the office which has AC sunrise to sunset, I just listen to the news), and unfortunately (or not) due to work pressures I have no time for anything - no frolicking for me this summer :-( Grisha On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Graham Dumpleton wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote .. Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak fixes, or keep digging for more leaks? Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python right now. Just because it is winter down here and I'm freezing my butt off doesn't mean I am any less busy. :-( Oh, I wasn't suggesting you were any less busy - just that folks in the northern hemisphere may well choose to frolic in the summer sun rather that hack away at mod_python in their spare time. :) Jim
Re: release 3.2.10?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: For 3.2.9 I called for 2 rounds of testing: one for the release candidate and one for the final tarball. Do folks here feel that is necessary for 3.2.10 or should I just jump right to the 3.2.10 final? That tarball would still be subject to a vote on this list before an official release. Cutting out the first step will save a few days. I think what you term it doesn't matter - if it's voted down, it will be voted down, be it 3.2.10 RC or 3.2.10 Final (we'll just have to make a 3.2.11 then). So just go for it :-) Grisha
Re: release 3.2.10?
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: (we'll just have to make a 3.2.11 then). Let's call that one the Spinal Tap version. :)
