On Tuesday 30 November 2004 02:46 pm, Thomas Heller wrote:
> http://www.python.org/doc/current/
> and
> http://docs.python.org/
>
> > still point to 2.3.4 docs.
I think everything is properly updated now. Please let me know if I've missed
anything.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Hi Larry,
FYI: I asked EB about the roster deadline and she says that she doesn't
know when it is either. Checking on the Lei Out web page didn't help
much either.
So, you are no wiser now than at the start of this message.
-tim
___
Python-Dev mailing
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Peter Åstrand wrote:
> 1) Is it OK to commit changes like this on the 2.4 branch, in addition to
> trunk?
I'm also wondering if patch 1071755 and 1071764 should go into
release24-maint:
* 1071755 makes subprocess raise TypeError if Popen is called with a
bufsize that is not
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 02:46 pm, Thomas Heller wrote:
> http://www.python.org/doc/current/
> and
> http://docs.python.org/
>
> still point to 2.3.4 docs.
I'll be fixing that up tonight.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
___
Python-Dev maili
Andrew Koenig wrote:
So it may be that a caveat is in order to people who do not install 2.4 as
Administrator.
I think the trouble is not with 2.4, here - the trouble is with
installing pywin32. As you said, the installation of Python itself
went fine.
> My hypothesis: When I install 2.4 as me, it
I'm planning to change the signature for subprocess.call slightly:
-def call(*args, **kwargs):
+def call(*popenargs, **kwargs):
The purpose is to make it clearer that "args" in this context is not the
same as the "args" argument to the Popen constructor. Two questions:
1) Is it OK to commit cha
http://www.python.org/doc/current/
and
http://docs.python.org/
still point to 2.3.4 docs.
Thomas
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pytho
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
Hello Walter,
I don't see that as a good solution, since every Python software
that is internationalizaed will have do figure out this wrapping,
introducing extra overhead unnecessarily.
This wrapping is probably necessary for stateful encodings. If you
had a sys.stdout.enco
Follow-up: When I install Python as Administrator, all is well. In that
case (but not when installing it as me), it asks whether I want to install
it for all users or for myself only. I then install pywin32 and it works.
So it may be that a caveat is in order to people who do not install 2.4 as
Hello Walter,
> >I don't see that as a good solution, since every Python software
> >that is internationalizaed will have do figure out this wrapping,
> >introducing extra overhead unnecessarily.
>
> This wrapping is probably necessary for stateful encodings. If you
> had a sys.stdout.encoding=="
I'm using Windows XP SP2.
Uninstalled 2.3, installed 2.4 (running as me, not as administrator).
No problems so far.
Tried installing pywin32-203.win32-py2.4.exe
When I try to install it as me, it gets as far as "ready to install." When
I click Next, it says
Can't load Python for pre-in
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
[...]
You are mixing things here:
The source encoding is meant for the
parser and defines the way Unicode literals are converted
into Unicode objects.
The encoding used on the stdout stream doesn't have anything
to do with the source code encoding and has to be handled
diffe
[...]
> You are mixing things here:
>
> The source encoding is meant for the
> parser and defines the way Unicode literals are converted
> into Unicode objects.
>
> The encoding used on the stdout stream doesn't have anything
> to do with the source code encoding and has to be handled
> different
> Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> >Given the fact that files have an 'encoding' parameter, and that
> >any unicode strings with characters not in the 0-127 range will
> >raise an exception if being written to files, isn't it reasonable
> >to respect the 'encoding' attribute whenever writing data to a
> >
I've cut the release24-maint branch, and updated the Include/patchlevel.h
on trunk and branch (trunk is now 2.5a0, branch is 2.4+)
The trunk and the branch are now both unfrozen and suitable for checkins.
The feature freeze on the trunk is lifted. Remember - if you're checking
bugfixes into the t
Hello Bob,
[...]
> >Given the fact that files have an 'encoding' parameter, and that
> >any unicode strings with characters not in the 0-127 range will
> >raise an exception if being written to files, isn't it reasonable
> >to respect the 'encoding' attribute whenever writing data to a
> >file?
>
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
happy to announce the release of Python 2.4.
Python 2.4 is a final, stable release, and we can recommend that Python
users upgrade to this version.
Python 2.4 is the result of almost 18 month's worth of work on top
of Python
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
Greetings,
Today, while trying to internationalize a program I'm working on,
I found an interesting side-effect of how we're dealing with
encoding of unicode strings while being written to files.
Suppose the following example:
# -*- encoding: iso-8859-1 -*-
print u"á"
Th
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
Given the fact that files have an 'encoding' parameter, and that
any unicode strings with characters not in the 0-127 range will
raise an exception if being written to files, isn't it reasonable
to respect the 'encoding' attribute whenever writing data to a
file?
In general,
19 matches
Mail list logo
