Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 258 open ( +4) / 2701 closed ( +1) / 2959 total ( +5)
Bugs: 812 open (+28) / 4642 closed (+13) / 5454 total (+41)
RFE : 160 open ( +4) / 136 closed ( +1) / 296 total ( +5)
New / Reopened Patches
__
#1074261
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Bethard
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Python-Dev] adding key argument to min and max
>
> This is my first post to Python dev, so I
> > I don't want to put words into your mouth, so is this a vote against a
> > key= argument for min and max?
>
> Right. I don't think there is any need.
Hm, min and max are probably needed 2-3 orders of magnitude more
frequently than nsmallest/nlargest. So I think it's reasonable to add
the key
> I don't want to put words into your mouth, so is this a vote against a
> key= argument for min and max?
Right. I don't think there is any need.
> If nsmallest/nlargest get key= arguments, this would definitely cover
> the same cases.
Right.
> If a key= argument gets vetoed for min and ma
Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Steven Bethard]
> > For Python 2.5, I'd like to add a keyword argument 'key' to min and
> > max like we have now for list.sort and sorted.
> . . .
> > This means that a 'key'
> > argument can *only* be specified as a keyword parameter, thus giving
>
[Steven Bethard]
> For Python 2.5, I'd like to add a keyword argument 'key' to min and
> max like we have now for list.sort and sorted.
. . .
> This means that a 'key'
> argument can *only* be specified as a keyword parameter, thus giving
> us the asymmetry we see in these examples.
FWIW, in Py2
At 02:03 PM 12/1/04 -0700, Steven Bethard wrote:
Is it okay to
have a parameter that is *only* accessable as a keyword parameter?
Yes.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://ma
Anthony Baxter wrote:
I've cut the release24-maint branch, and updated the Include/patchlevel.h
on trunk and branch (trunk is now 2.5a0, branch is 2.4+)
The trunk and the branch are now both unfrozen and suitable for checkins.
The feature freeze on the trunk is lifted. Remember - if you're checking
This is my first post to Python dev, so I figured I should introduce myself.
My name's Steven Bethard and I'm a computer science Ph.D. student at
the University of Colorado at Boulder working primarily in the areas
of natural language processing and machine learning. During my
undergrad at the Un
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004, Tim Hochberg wrote:
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> FYI: I asked EB about the roster deadline and she says that she doesn't
> know when it is either. Checking on the Lei Out web page didn't help
> much either.
>
> So, you are no wiser now than at the start of this message.
We're even l
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Preparing for the distutils patch to allow building extensions
using the .NET SDK compilers, I am compiling a list of version
numbers and MS compiler logo outputs in order to use these to
identify the correct compiler to use for the extensions.
These are the compilers I have fo
"Andrew Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Follow-up: When I install Python as Administrator, all is well. In that
> case (but not when installing it as me), it asks whether I want to install
> it for all users or for myself only. I then install pywin32 and it works.
>
> So it may be that a
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:10:10 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please provide me with more version numbers and logo
> printouts ?
>
* MS Windows XP DDK (International version, optimizing VC 7.0):
Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 13.00.9176 for 80x8
Preparing for the distutils patch to allow building extensions
using the .NET SDK compilers, I am compiling a list of version
numbers and MS compiler logo outputs in order to use these to
identify the correct compiler to use for the extensions.
These are the compilers I have found so far:
* MS VC6
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 09:00, Peter Astrand wrote:
> I'm also wondering if patch 1071755 and 1071764 should go into
> release24-maint:
>
> * 1071755 makes subprocess raise TypeError if Popen is called with a
> bufsize that is not an integer.
Since this isn't changing anything that's user fa
[Reposted to python-dev!]
Hello there,
We've has done some customizations to difflib to make it work well
with pagetests we are running on a project at Canonical, and we are
looking for some guidance as to what's the best way to do them. There
are some tricky bits that have to do with how th
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
[...]
The idiom presented by Bob is the right way to go: wrap
sys.stdout with a StreamWriter.
I don't see that as a good solution, since every Python software
that is internationalizaed will have do figure out this wrapping,
introducing extra overhead unnecessarily.
I don't
17 matches
Mail list logo
