I noticed that Makefile.pre.in uses the value from the environment variable
LDFLAGS but not CPPFLAGS. Any reason for this? ``./configure -h`` lists both
(and some other environment variables which are not really used either) so it
seems a little misleading to have those listed but to not utili
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Hmph. The xmllib module has been deprecated since Py2.0 but is not
> listed in PEP 4.
>
> Question: Do we have to keep it for another two years because of that
> omission?
>
> It seems somewhat silly to keep an obsolete, supplanted module that
> doesn't full support XM
Hmph. The xmllib module has been deprecated since Py2.0 but is not
listed in PEP 4.
Question: Do we have to keep it for another two years because of that
omission?
It seems somewhat silly to keep an obsolete, supplanted module that
doesnt full support XML 1.0.
Raymond
__
Any objections to removing Cookie.Cookie, Cookie.SmartCookie,
and Cookie.SerialCookie?
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mail
The relevant bug appears to be 1076467 at SourceForge.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Removed Files:
>whrandom.py
> Log Message:
> Remove the deprecated whrandom module.
Woo hoo! It's about friggin' time .
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscr
[Resend, since a minor brain explosion caused me to send this to c.l.p instead
of python-dev]
Stelios Xanthakis wrote:
It appears that there are the 'module people' who
find this feature irrelevant. Indeed. If we are interested
in distributing modules and increasing the number of
people who use p
Stelios Xanthakis wrote:
The key point is that I think think should be the
job of the parser and the functionality provided
at the interactive prompt w/o the user having to
write 'dyndef' or store the code of exec's or request
from himself to use specific commands to create
functions. It should be
"Edward C. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a PC with an AMD cpu and Mandrake 10.1. While installing Python
> 2.4 "make test" failed in "test_shutils.py". Here is the output of
> "./python ./Lib/test/test_shutil.py":
Are you running 'make test' as root? Don't do that (although possibl
I'm opposed to this idea. It creates overhead in
the size of .pyc files,
No it doesn't.
for no additional value that couldn't be obtained otherwise.
Martin:
I know it is possible to do all this with existing
python facilities. I did write such a dynamic code
framework in python. Specifically I u
[Stelios Xanthakis Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:59:30PM +0200]
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, holger krekel wrote:
> >We are about to test out this approach with the py lib
> >(http://codespeak.net/py) and want to have it work for
> >for Python 2.2, 2.3. and 2.4.
>
> Do you plan hacking python ?
> It appears th
11 matches
Mail list logo
