Any objections to replacing the likes of types.IntType and
types.ListType with int and list?
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/optio
Raymond> [Skip]
>> If lists are conceptually like vectors or arrays in other languages
>> and tuples are like C structs or Pascal records, then by converting
>> from list to tuple form you've somehow muddied the data structure
>> water just to take advantage of tuples' immutabi
> Modified Files:
> Tag: release23-maint
> test_copy.py
> Log Message:
> fix bug 1114776
Don't forget release24-maint.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscrib
[Neal]
> I think I implemented this once. I'll try to see if I can find a
> patch. It wasn't too difficult, but I'm not sure if the patch was
> clean.
If the opportunity arises, another worthwhile peepholer buildout would
be to recognize if-elif chains that can be transformed to a single
lookup
[Skip]
> If lists are conceptually like vectors or
> arrays
> in other languages and tuples are like C structs or Pascal records,
then
> by
> converting from list to tuple form you've somehow muddied the data
> structure
> water just to take advantage of tuples' immutability.
In the context of lit
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:49:05 -0600, Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have the peephole optimizer recognize the throwaway
> nature of lists in these contexts:
>
> for elt in [1, 2, 4, 8, 16]:
> ...
>
> if foo in [list, tuple]:
> ...
>
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:49:05 -0600, Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In a python-checkins message, Raymond stated:
>
> Raymond> Replace list of constants with tuples of constants.
>
> I understand the motivation here (the peephole optimizer can convert a tuple
> of constants into
In a python-checkins message, Raymond stated:
Raymond> Replace list of constants with tuples of constants.
I understand the motivation here (the peephole optimizer can convert a tuple
of constants into a single constant that need not be constructed over and
over), but is the effort worth the
[Anthony Baxter]
>> Ok, so here's the state of play: 2.3.5 is currently aimed for next
>> Tuesday, but there's an outstanding issue - the new copy code appears
>> to have broken something, see www.python.org/sf/1114776 for the gory
>> details.
...
[Alex Martelli]
> The problem boils down to: deepc
On 2005 Feb 06, at 08:34, Tim Peters wrote:
...
The easy fix: instead of cls.__mro__ use inspect.getmro which deals
with that specifically.
...
Since the original bug report came from Zopeland, chances are good
(although the report is too vague to be sure) that the problem
involves ExtensionC
10 matches
Mail list logo
